It is recommendable to change from the
determined this way to
. This transformation
corresponds to replacing the Jacobi matrix
by its inverse. The original quantity
gives the true
shape of objects at affine distance
that show a circular image on the observer’s sky. The new quantity
gives the observed shape for objects at affine distance
that actually have a circular cross-section.
In other words, if a (small) spherical body at affine distance
is observed, the ellipticity of its image on
the observer’s sky is given by
.
By Equations (50
, 51
),
vanishes along the entire ray if and only if the shear
vanishes along the
entire ray. By Equations (26
, 33
), the shear vanishes along the entire ray if and only if the conformal
curvature term
vanishes along the entire ray. The latter condition means that
is tangent to a
principal null direction of the conformal curvature tensor (see, e.g., Chandrasekhar [54
]). At a point where
the conformal curvature tensor is not zero, there are at most four different principal null directions. Hence,
the distortion effect vanishes along all light rays if and only if the conformal curvature vanishes everywhere,
i.e., if and only if the spacetime is conformally flat. This result is due to Sachs [291]. An alternative
proof, based on expressions for image distortions in terms of the exponential map, was given by
Hasse [148].
For any observer, the distortion measure
is defined along every light ray from every point of
the observer’s worldline. This gives
as a function of the observational coordinates
(recall
Section 2.1, in particular Equation (4
)). If we fix
and
,
is a function on the observer’s sky.
(Instead of
, one may choose any of the distance measures discussed in Section 2.4, provided it is a
unique function of
.) In spacetimes with sufficiently many symmetries, this function can be explicitly
determined in terms of integrals over the metric function. This will be worked out for spherically
symmetric static spacetimes in Section 4.3. A general consideration of image distortion and example
calculations can also be found in papers by Frittelli, Kling and Newman [120
, 119
]. Frittelli and
Oberst [126] calculate image distortion by a “thick gravitational lens” model within a spacetime
setting.
In cases where it is not possible to determine
by explicitly integrating the relevant differential
equations, one may consider series expansions with respect to the affine parameter
. This technique,
which is of particular relevance in view of cosmology, dates back to Kristian and Sachs [189] who
introduced image distortion as an observable in cosmology. In lowest non-vanishing order,
is
quadratic with respect to
and completely determined by the conformal curvature tensor at the
observation event
, as can be read from Equations (50
, 51
, 33
). One can classify all possible
distortion patterns on the observer’s sky in terms of the Petrov type of the Weyl tensor [56
]. As
outlined in [56
], these patterns are closely related to what Penrose and Rindler [262
] call the
fingerprint of the Weyl tensor. At all observation events where the Weyl tensor is non-zero, the
following is true. There are at most four points on the observer’s sky where the distortion vanishes,
corresponding to the four (not necessarily distinct) principal null directions of the Weyl tensor. For
type
, where all four principal null directions coincide, the distortion pattern is shown in
Figure 5
.
The distortion effect is routinely observed since the mid-1980s in the form of arcs and (radio)
rings (see [298
, 275, 343] for an overview). In these cases a distant galaxy appears strongly
elongated in one direction. Such strong elongations occur near a caustic point of multiplicity one
where
. In the case of rings and (long) arcs, the entire bundle cannot be treated as
infinitesimally thin, i.e., a theoretical description of the effect requires an integration. For the
idealized case of a point source, images in the form of (1-dimensional) rings on the observer’s sky
occur in cases of rotational symmetry and are usually called “Einstein rings” (see Section 4.3).
The rings that are actually observed show extended sources in situations close to rotational
symmetry.
For the majority of galaxies that are not distorted into arcs or rings, there is a “weak lensing” effect on
the apparent shape that can be investigated statistically. The method is based on the assumption that there
is no prefered direction in the universe, i.e., that the axes of (approximately spheroidal) galaxies are
randomly distributed. So, without a distortion effect, the axes of galaxy images should make a randomly
distributed angle with the
grid on the observer’s sky. Any deviation from a random
distribution is to be attributed to a distortion effect, produced by the gravitational field of intervening
masses. With the help of the quasi-Newtonian approximation, this method has been elaborated
into a sophisticated formalism for determining mass distributions, projected onto the plane
perpendicular to the line of sight, from observed image distortions. This is one of the most important
astrophysical tools for detecting (dark) matter. It has been used to determine the mass distribution in
galaxies and galaxy clusters, and more recently observations of image distortions produced
by large-scale structure have begun (see [22] for a detailed review). From a methodological
point of view, it would be desirable to analyse this important line of astronomical research
within a spacetime setting. This should give prominence to the role of the conformal curvature
tensor.
Another interesting way of observing weak image distortions is possible for sources that emit linearly
polarized radiation. (This is true for many radio galaxies. Polarization measurements are also relevant for
strong-lensing situations; see Schneider, Ehlers, and Falco [298
], p. 82 for an example.) The method is
based on the geometric optics approximation of Maxwell’s theory. In this approximation, the
polarization vector is parallel along each ray between source and observer [88] (cf., e.g., [226
],
p. 577). We may, thus, use the polarization vector as a realization of the Sachs basis vector
.
If the light source is a spheroidal celestial body (e.g., an elliptic galaxy), it is reasonable to
assume that at the light source the polarization direction is aligned with one of the axes, i.e.,
. A distortion effect is verified if the observed polarization direction is not aligned
with an axis of the image,
. It is to be emphasized that the deviation of the
polarization direction from the elongation axis is not the result of a rotation (the bundles under
consideration have a vertex and are, thus, twist-free) but rather of successive shearing processes
along the ray. Also, the effect has nothing to do with the rotation of an observer field. It is a
pure conformal curvature effect. Related misunderstandings have been clarified by Panov and
Sbytov [254
, 255]. The distortion effect on the polarization plane has, so far, not been observed. (Panov
and Sbytov [254] have clearly shown that an effect observed by Birch [31], even if real, cannot
be attributed to distortion.) Its future detectability is estimated, for distant radio sources,
in [317].
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-9 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |