Posts by dictvm@chaos.social
 (DIR) Post #AU9WK7z1F4mApvnn4S by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-03-30T20:38:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @4bz @tek I agree. That's why I'm in support of the protests in France right now, for example.If your violence can prevent immediate harm for yourself, it's perfectly legit to use it. When people talk about punching people they disagree with, that's different.If that person is actively and directly encouraging others to harm you, violence towards that person is legit as well.
       
 (DIR) Post #AU9XJ9TeIm4N8QEAWe by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-03-30T20:40:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @4bz @tek I've just seen too many Leftist (on Twitter mostly) calling for violence towards people whose opinions they disagree with (not to say that the Right isn't doing the same) and that just doesn't go with me.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPNFBvdyU7NpcAhYe by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T12:13:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @stux @wolfensteijn what do you think "making" means?Creating CAD models on a computer?
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPNOu03ULLR7crj0q by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T12:15:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @stux "You can't criticize capitalism if you have an iPhone or if you earn money yourself"Gatekeeping is a bullshit distraction.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPe74neulz42pE87k by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T15:23:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bananarama what I was trying to say is this: You don't get to disqualify people's criticism only because they participate in what they're against. "You can't be against the West because the West made it possible for you to have an iPhone"Which isn't as smart a take as one might assume after thinking it through for more than a minute.@stux
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPeHSx9y6ElqmcoLI by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T15:24:54Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bananarama read the initial post you're replying to and then please explain how it isn't saying exactly that. @stux
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPeZbDJzh1ggOpaaG by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T15:28:10Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bananarama you just quoted the one sentence I wasn't referring to. Are you ok?@stux
       
 (DIR) Post #AUPenI8jhuora2DPo8 by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-07T15:30:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bananarama if that makes you feel smarter and keeps you out of my mentions, sure. @stux
       
 (DIR) Post #AUS3b6JjTnt0hVViTo by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-08T15:38:02Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Elizafox agreed. I'm thinking a lot about that, especially since I observe how the somewhat anarchical Fediverse is handling conflict.Admins defederate based on single misbehaving actors, people of other instances having different approaches to content moderation as them, #fediblock often is a toxic "there are people I strongly disagree with and so should you, or else you're a Nazi".I wish we'd be more open to dissent and letting people live their lives more often.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUS3bBp70YxRmHELaK by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-08T15:40:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Elizafox we can still come together to fight bad actors without burning bridges between cities/instances just because the values of the Other don't overlap a 100%.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUcOe2LUDQW0mVwBiC by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-13T19:00:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lauren I'm strangely irritated by the direction the discourse around this topic has taken. I remember the angle having been "top secret is such is such an overused classification and everyone and their neighbour seem to getting clearance without intensive background checks" during the Snowden years. It's really confusing.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUcPjv8a1o6c7LGoS0 by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-13T19:12:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lauren that the classification has been completely diluted in meaning, resulting in critical information being available to an unnecessarily broad group of people.
       
 (DIR) Post #AUdW74KUoNqEAbE03c by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-04-14T07:59:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @strypey they're often even funding them via their own VC think tanks like In-Q-Tel.
       
 (DIR) Post #AV1f59hl4vZRgJ1kH2 by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-03-12T13:07:01Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       When Rome sent their first scouts to your village you didn't consider that an honor of recognition of your tribe's achievements. You trained your tribe's people, produced weapons and prepared to defend yourself, because it wouldn't be long until they send their first armies to your village. Meta is Rome.#fediverse
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbiUoaPztm7pfMqSe by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-13T09:00:32Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ParadeGrotesque wtf. How is France doing that? Can you evade that by changing DNS servers or is it more sophisticated?
       
 (DIR) Post #AVbkRyD5xYcMigEI2C by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-13T09:22:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ParadeGrotesque phew, okay, that's similar to how Germany blocks RT right now.
       
 (DIR) Post #AVzTh3MLwGDvr2eJRg by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-24T11:19:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @stillnotlovin gab doch erst gestern wieder Festnahmen bei Reichsbürgern und vermeintlichen Putschisten?
       
 (DIR) Post #AVzTrxHQsjxIBXXvd2 by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-24T20:09:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wauz @Heinrich_Konstantin_Tessmann guter Punkt.
       
 (DIR) Post #AW87CAIfdOXJpnQsKm by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-28T19:56:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Radical_EgoCom I don't see it happening, unfortunately. If it were to happen, it'd probably be a populist-conservative/nationalistic movement to do it. I don't see a sufficiently aligned left and even if a left-ish movement would arise, it'd be very difficult to gain the support of the military due to conflicting interests before being gunned down by them. France's protest culture is beautiful to watch though. I hope I'm totally wrong in my conclusion.
       
 (DIR) Post #AW87CBWX5LDdd4vSa0 by dictvm@chaos.social
       2023-05-28T20:08:55Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Radical_EgoCom Nazis have been planning for instability in lots of democratic countries  for decades and some of them are well funded and even supported by branches of several secret services. The left being anti gun (not saying that I'm pro gun) doesn't help the situation in terms of power balances while the right is known to have international networks and arms depots. Doesn't end well, I worry.