Re: purpose of the vworlds list
Kevin Goldsmith (unitcirc@netcom.com)
Fri, 21 Apr 1995 09:40:33 -0700 (PDT)
>
> Hi all there seems to be confusion developing abut VR-ART
>
> Well all it seems the list owner for vworld feels that vworlds will cover
> the creative discussion an the theoretical side of VR usage and so wont's
> to define the propose of VR-ART just the pratical side
> some have sead that this is an atempt to monopolise creative discussion an VR.
>
No one has said this to me. That was not my intent whatsoever.
What I am trying to avoid is having two mailing lists with the same
agendas. It is unnecessary.
> this is why VR-ART was set up I do not care what your previous disciplines,
> skills where
> all are welcome. All are needed to help DEFINE this now DISCIPLINE, CRAFT,
> SCIENCE of VR.
>
that's also why the vworlds-list was set up.
Sean, I like your mainfesto and certainly agree with most of it,
even though it could have been construed as a personal attack. Let's
take the discussion on the purposes of our respective lists into private
e-mail so we can avoid spamming people, ok?
Kevin