Re: purpose of the vworlds list
Knut Mork (knut@gar.no)
Fri, 21 Apr 95 15:46:29 +0200
Reply to your message of Friday April 21, 1995 22:45 +0200
-----------------------------------------------------------------
| Carl Loeffler sead on VR-ART
| "Nice to see this list, tho I'm confused by the seperation into two
| groups"
| Well all it seems the list owner for vworld feels that vworlds will cover
| the creative discussion an the theoretical side of VR usage and so wont's
| to define the propose of VR-ART just the pratical side
| some have sead that this is an atempt to monopolise creative discussion an VR.
I think, basically, the guy who made vr-worlds (am I right, Kevin?) just
didn't know about vr-art, and now it's kind of hard to merge them. Though
we can try.
| I wont to build it, See it, touch it, shape it, show it,CREATE IT and then
| discourse it
This is a little tough for me, because I am indeed currently creating it,
but talking too much about large art projects in-the-making isn't always
a wise thing to do... ;)
| VR NOW LET OUT THE BOX CAN NEVER BE PUT BACK IN AGAIN
Damn. I *knew* there was a hitch...
[knut]