Post B8lC6rc6T2EjTNVy40 by cryptgoat@fedifreu.de
 (DIR) More posts by cryptgoat@fedifreu.de
 (DIR) Post #B8lB1z9Mv3lrReBTfM by fdroidorg@floss.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @cryptgoat Did you report the "quickly abandoned" apps? How much time does it need to pass between commit/releases to call one abandoned?
       
 (DIR) Post #B8lC6rc6T2EjTNVy40 by cryptgoat@fedifreu.de
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @fdroidorg I know that's hard to define and I don't mind apps being abandoned at some point, that's how life goes when you make software. There have been tons of these even without AI slop around.What I would like to see is some official statement on #AI / LLM driven apps in #FDroid by the F-Droid council. We have had a ton of anti-ferature flags for tracking, non-libre services, ads, NSFW stuff. While big FOSS and software platforms take a stance (such as @flathub and @Codeberg) I find it a bit disappointing that there is nothing like this for F-Droid. I am not saying F-Droid should ban all AI/LLM supported apps but I would appreciate if you make clear where F-Droid is at because your stance on other issues has been rather clear in the past. When it comes to AI it seems more like: We don't give a shit, hell is coming for us all anyway. ¯_(ツ)_/¯Or maybe I have missed some statement on this? 👀
       
 (DIR) Post #B8lCalssKlGcOHcXbc by fdroidorg@floss.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @cryptgoat There's https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/work_items/641 and https://gitlab.com/fdroid/admin/-/work_items/686 at least. While the "#AI problem" has a spectrum of use, inclusion and function. For now we've only got toots that "#FDroid should do something" seemly glancing over the work needed to classify and maintain such.