Post B6yUVphlvRpJc0SwhF by daemonspudguy@app.wafrn.net
 (DIR) More posts by daemonspudguy@app.wafrn.net
 (DIR) Post #B6yUVphlvRpJc0SwhF by daemonspudguy@app.wafrn.net
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne@social.treehouse.systems @technomancy@hey.hagelb.orgI'm of the belief that not being on a rolling release but instead being on a fixed release system is setting yourself up for endless issues. I've broken so many self-declared stable Linux distros because I needed to use a piece of software that literally did not work on the absolutely ancient ass versions of software that came with Debian Stable or even the at the time latest versions of Ubuntu. I also feel like trying to completely eradicate LLM extruded software from your system is an uphill, losing battle if even the goddamn kernel is being committed to with the plagiarism machine. Does this mean I think it's a waste of time to make alternatives that aren't being fucked with by promptfondlers? No. It does however mean that I think staying on extremely out of date versions of software is generally a bad idea (unless it's, like, the current version of rsync which was made infinitely worse by the LLM extruders).
       
 (DIR) Post #B6yUVsqkEXmpMhgebA by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @technomancy @daemonspudguy yes the point of Wolfi was to demonstrate that you could have rolling-release enterprise linux and that it was actually better.