Post B6SeykbiKhJNiszh0S by SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt
 (DIR) More posts by SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt
 (DIR) Post #B6SZ87OCOqUnGGkw1A by thephd@pony.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Whoa. I had put it on the backburner but apparently someone was so excited by the _Record types proposal that they implemented it in a compiler and sent it to me.Damn, I gotta pick that one up for C29, it seems...!
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SZCAvBD517NF7Jlw by thephd@pony.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I do need to fix up the proposal: there's some scoping issues (the annotation is too viral and needs a non-viral form) but I'm happy someone implemented and proved out the base form. Exciting!!
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SeykbiKhJNiszh0S by SRAZKVT@tech.lgbt
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @thephd what are the record types again ?
       
 (DIR) Post #B6SeykmLh9ooFryBaC by thephd@pony.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @SRAZKVT this one: https://thephd.dev/_vendor/future_cxx/papers/C%20-%20_Record%20types.html