Post B6QVPWgMpGLaUqNaTY by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
 (DIR) Post #B6QV0prmMYmYkswaCu by synx508@bsd.network
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       But which is correct?
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QV0q37gNr9K4FdtA by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @synx508 (3458a has entered the chat)None of the above
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QVPWTxZOQFsMZg8W by synx508@bsd.network
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @azonenberg Well, yeah…
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QVPWgMpGLaUqNaTY by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @synx508 increasing accuracy is always a never ending pursuit.As the old saying goes, a man with both a GPSDO and a rubidium standard never knows what 10 MHz is to better than 1e-11 or so
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QVqDbdrIwJ9RtgNk by synx508@bsd.network
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @azonenberg indeed, my next job is to look at an old OCXO that is substantially off-frequency, coincidentally.
       
 (DIR) Post #B6QVqDmdCRjJhX2SVk by azonenberg@ioc.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @synx508 lol small world.On that note, i need to find a lab I can send my rubidium to so i can get good traceable cal on it and use it as a transfer standard. But i imagine your average local cal lab probably doesn't have anything good enough to do this level of time accuracy they probably use a rubidium as their own master standard