Post B6ChysKMov4L04GwbY by KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st
(DIR) More posts by KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st
(DIR) Post #B63trzYwyJWcRKwEkK by sickburnbro@poa.st
2 likes, 1 repeats
they're just crying tears that the institutions they destroyed are now recognized as useless.
(DIR) Post #B64A0TIjt3hMFuQAOu by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
0 likes, 0 repeats
As far as I can tell, this stuff was all worthless since ~ever.Maybe like 5% real research, 95% circlejerking, looking for more funding, citing each other trash papers in new trash papers (circlejerking), and ruining the career of anyone who wants to do real research.It might have been better in the 1800s before Robert Maxwell and public funding... Who knows.
(DIR) Post #B64BPUsPGcqMKpbKVc by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
0 likes, 0 repeats
Oh, and anybody who is like "BUT THE SCIENCE đđđ" is 100% definitively a worthless leach, because anyone who is serious about research has a much more jaded view of academia and when it loses credibility they will always have very mixed feelings about it.
(DIR) Post #B64BPV9QFMSFBbYv20 by FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz
0 likes, 0 repeats
Academia is not the only institution that was demolished by ideologues. Every institution is demolished, I dare you to name an institution that is not an Ideological, Militarized Headquarter.I am waiting.
(DIR) Post #B64BVsoBCal6IOfXto by sickburnbro@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
it's because when you say "hey, let's liquidize all civilization institutions in order to generate power" the choices are endless ( until you run out of civilization )Think about what "perpetual revolution" means in this context.
(DIR) Post #B64BYDEOF3HqDO2VkG by sickburnbro@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
They aren't revolutioning to "make things better" .. except maybe for themselves.
(DIR) Post #B64CgQgwBDbAETsH5c by FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz
0 likes, 0 repeats
These people are the modern-day Jacobin, they match historical records to the tee, and its not their fault that they could not replicate the full and identical results.Its Trump's fault.
(DIR) Post #B6ChysKMov4L04GwbY by KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
Well itâs true that the jews couldnât care less about Science; only whatever gives them a leg up over gullible goyim. So itâs the collapse of Trust in Science - and not the collapse of Science, itself - which is significant to jews.
(DIR) Post #B6Chysm1A7BeNpD1hg by ThatWouldBeTelling@shitposter.world
0 likes, 0 repeats
@KingOfWhiteAmerica @sickburnbro "Well itâs true that the jews couldnât care less about Science; only whatever gives them a leg up over gullible goyim."As a general principle, absolutely. See psychoanalysis and blank slate Boasian anthropology as detailed in the The Culture of Critique for example. But in the same first half of the 19th Century, contra @cjd there were very solid fields of science that included Jewish scientists, physics being one of the best documented.The latest and just out edition of that book's excellent rewritten and updated preface notes for example how as Einstein got older he got a lot more ethnocentric, but the fields of physics he contributed to weren't Jewish projects like the two prior mentioned ones. See also revolutionary Jew Bohr (I believe that mindset really helped him) and Pauli.That first half century was extraordinarily productive, including laying the foundations for semiconductors, and built upon, or perhaps augmented Maxwell's work from the previous century.https://antelopehillpublishing.com/product/the-culture-of-critique-by-dr-kevin-macdonald/
(DIR) Post #B6Ci1Jxx23SDIYxBlg by KingOfWhiteAmerica@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
Full disclosure; from my perspective, jews ruined physics - examples like Einstein and Bohr doing nothing to disabuse me of that opinion. Einstein found himself in the perfect place to extract cutting-edge ideas from the trusting goyim - so, good for him, I guess; use whatever means one has as his own disposal, allâs fair in love and war and all that jazz. He was basically intelligent enough to glean from the patent office the Photovoltaic Effect, and write a paper about it before anyone else did. If itâd ended there, no big deal; but jews wanted to make sure one of their own guys sits in the âworldâs smartest manâ chair, and he was the closest thing to a reasonable candidate. Niels Bohr and his âshut up and calculateâ school of thought isnât anything that hadnât occured to any White man; it just isnât really a worthwhile approach to a White man, who understands that getting at Truth is far more rewarding in the long run than getting at results. These being the two you named, I wonât drone on; nevertheless this same pattern can easily be discerned nigh any time a jew is credited with scientific discovery. For the White Man, progress equals securing True Knowledge; for the jew, progress equals getting other people to do what you want.
(DIR) Post #B6Ci3T14M1yTwkR3aq by sickburnbro@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
I love history of science
(DIR) Post #B6Ci9sxco3hi9JsvTs by Elliptica@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
I don't completely agree with the anti-Einstein stuff I see in various conspiracy / WN circles. For instance, the Photoelectric effect had been observed for decades, Einstein's contribution was applying Plack's observations of how light is emitted to how light gets absorbed. It was a perfectly reasonable observation to come to. The only shenangigens I'm aware of with Einstein is between him and Hilbert over priority of GR. And it's similar with Bohr.I think the real "issue" of the era, as with now, is that Jews have carved out spaces in academia for themselves at the expense of others, so starting in the 20th century, they were the ones in position to be the first ones to make major advances in topics like physics.They also have a tendency to claim credit for all advances, while ignoring the contributions of others (you see this especially with Quantum Mechanics, which was largely founded by men like Planck, Dirac, Heisenberg). It's not that Jews didn't contribute either, but they've certainly used myths (like the Nazis hated physics because it was Jewish) to make their contributions seem more all encompassing.
(DIR) Post #B6Ci9tFLk9sl2IB56m by jmw150@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
Also that graduate programs are set up to be much easier to enter with money. So jews can get in using shekels instead of talent and be over represented, not that they have any trouble at all writing letters for each other. There has been a push in the USA to get rid of GRE exam requirements on admission, likely for more of them and browns to get in.
(DIR) Post #B6Ci9tTss7VZlMyglM by ThatWouldBeTelling@shitposter.world
0 likes, 0 repeats
@jmw150 @cjd @sickburnbro "Also that graduate programs are set up to be much easier to enter with money. So jews can get in using shekels instead of talent and be over represented, not that they have any trouble at all writing letters for each other."This shouldn't hold true for STEM, where last time I checked students get paid for both helping to teach undergraduates (which also helps you learn your field better), and then research.Not a lot of money, and I'd wonder which Jews still take this path with all the brown and competition after the (((1980s decision))) we were paying too much for science labor. It's also no longer a big prestige field unless you make it to the top, but you could see Jewish networking helping that. "There has been a push in the USA to get rid of GRE exam requirements on admission, likely for more of them and browns to get in."For STEM, the best way to get into a good program is getting a scientist at your school to tell one at your target that you can do research.One thing to overlay all this is the tiers of schools. Middle can be very grim, lots of cargo culting, and professors unhappy they didn't get a top position.Lowest end without graduate students and real research programs can be very good for undergraduates since the teachers are there to teach, not fight for crumbs in a publish or perish environment. Back in the day MIT accepted more than a few whites from these schools.Higher end can be very bad if the professors don't care about teaching anyone but their own lab's grad students. See the archetypal low trust Third World grad student with poor English and no motivation in charge of teaching a serious subject.One reason the vast majority of ABET accredited computer science departments are almost worthless, for example Java schools back in the day (now Python schools???).And very interestingly Harvard which was a very early pre-electronic pioneer not play the ABET game and is much more math heavy that ABET's minimal requirements of single variable calculus (but not multi-variable???) and a discrete math semester.And these fields at least pretend to have objective metrics for good work; the "humanities" and "sciences" below biology? I don't need to say more....
(DIR) Post #B6Ci9tmJlaFmgXbPUm by jmw150@poa.st
0 likes, 0 repeats
Yeah jewish networking really does do a lot. I had a jewish algebraic topology professor that admitted to the low rigor of the field and how little he checks for correctness in papers. Math has to be obviously wrong. It is hard to distinguish yourself if peer review is lax enough. These secret handshakes can make up the difference. One other time in undergrad I had a conservative jewish philosophy professor and I lied that I was jewish. Very night and day difference in treatment. He suddenly became very interested in my success, till he figured it out. Free books, applications to schools paid for, sitting me on committees, etc...Third is the general sense for many jews that they do not have to work at all. They are in these positions for the sake of influence. So physics being something people in industry look up to got a lot of jews to want to be in those positions.