Post B5sZrmnoHML52gxDZA by root42@chaos.social
 (DIR) More posts by root42@chaos.social
 (DIR) Post #B5po8zM5g0hemWCos4 by vwestlife@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       RE: https://indieweb.social/@lonseidman/116495787749672366Who knew? The descendant of Cyrix CPUs live on in China, and they still suck at gaming, just like the original Cyrixes of 30 years ago.RT: https://indieweb.social/users/lonseidman/statuses/116495787749672366
       
 (DIR) Post #B5pv4Zdi2qFlXvHy3k by KanawhaCountyWX@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @vwestlife @lonseidman Not a descendant in terms of technology, but in terms of corporations, an embedded system I own uses a 1.6 GHz Via Eden CPU, designed for low-power applications. It's quite slow.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5pyOO6yulR9Rn7WDY by yeen125@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @vwestlife Wasn’t Quake largely responsible for killing Cyrix?
       
 (DIR) Post #B5rRskStSedDI89tcu by vwestlife@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @KanawhaCountyWX @lonseidman Yes, the Chinese CPUs are a joint venture with VIA, whose CPUs were initially based on a Cyrix design, but then switched to a design by Centaur, based on their work developing the WinChip for IDT, another x86-compatible CPU that was briefly popular in the late '90s.
       
 (DIR) Post #B5sZrmnoHML52gxDZA by root42@chaos.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @vwestlife I think the Cyrix and IBM CPUs were underrated. Yes, FPU performance was weaker than their Pentium counterparts, but they were much more affordable and integer performance was much better. I had the 6x86 and later the MX or MII variants. They were cheap enough that I could afford them as a highschool student. They were also quite quick under Linux, helping with constant kernel recompiling. :)
       
 (DIR) Post #B62grH64njTByBnhYm by yalek0391@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @vwestlife because nobody knows how to make a decent CPU anymore...lol