Post B4pwrEhSjufGwlISKO by icedquinn@blob.cat
 (DIR) More posts by icedquinn@blob.cat
 (DIR) Post #B4pqGosaf9g0iRkn68 by ironicbadger@techhub.social
       5 likes, 6 repeats
       
       Brutal. When Microsoft acquired GitHub.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ps2J8a59mK7jRPQu by icedquinn@blob.cat
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       > 99.5% is the lower bandi mean. the chart looks catastrophic because its zoomed in a ton.RE: https://techhub.social/@ironicbadger/116326155409620757
       
 (DIR) Post #B4puWwpdGPdvpUJf2u by djsumdog@djsumdog.com
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Github also has a lot of services. I bet this chart uses this methodology for aggregation:https://mrshu.github.io/github-statuses/Most of those services are pretty essential though (actions for ci/cd, API for integrations, PRs, etc..) so using the aggregate isn't entirely unfair. The graph is misleading, but it's still pretty bad when the big players really want 99.<some large amount of 9s>.I really preferred working at places that just self hosted source control and CI/CD.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4pwrEhSjufGwlISKO by icedquinn@blob.cat
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @djsumdog 99% uptime SLA means like 3 days out of the entire year the service can be in a failed state.but in gambling odds i want to see people who engage in monetary gambling and would turn down 99% odds of returns.if society is going to collapse when a service dips for 3 days a year its too load bearing and probably needs decentralized.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4qvFRnhg4mDmGaonw by andymckay@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ironicbadger hmm, quite a few opinions on that chart 😀 tl;dr it’s complicated.Most of GitHub services, until I left a couple of years ago were not on Azure.