Post B4AFD9syxPJSvFyGUC by funcrunch@me.dm
 (DIR) More posts by funcrunch@me.dm
 (DIR) Post #B48R6tCisOlMa83tTs by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @evacide oh hell naw, they better not be doing that to me
       
 (DIR) Post #B4AFD9cfw2Gk6gLF4K by leon_p_smith@ioc.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @evacide @tomhead surely there has to be a fairly strong legal argument here, at least one of which revolves around one's right of publicity.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4AFD9syxPJSvFyGUC by funcrunch@me.dm
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @leon_p_smith @evacide @tomhead Maybe the living experts that Grammarly has appropriated can put together a class-action lawsuit. Some big names in the list, including Stephen King and Neil deGrasse Tyson.https://www.wired.com/story/grammarly-is-offering-expert-ai-reviews-from-your-favorite-authors-dead-or-alive/
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ApvhKtY2Wtl3Z3Ka by jessamyn@glammr.us
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @evacide I saw that they're offering an "opt out" feature for experts, but it's still 100% total bullshit that they did this.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4ApvhaUc30SXQrVdw by 0xC01DC0FFEE@bytearray.eu
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @jessamyn @evacide using an opt-out system for a use case where it would have been entirely feasible to ask everyone affected for permission is just incredible assholery :blobcatreeeeeee: