The Einstein–Langevin equation (14
) may also be derived by a method based on functional
techniques [208
]. Here we will summarize these techniques starting with semiclassical gravity.
In semiclassical gravity functional methods were used to study the backreaction of quantum
fields in cosmological models [123, 90, 129]. The primary advantage of the effective action
approach is, in addition to the well-known fact that it is easy to introduce perturbation schemes
like loop expansion and nPI formalisms, that it yields a fully self-consistent solution. For a
general discussion in the semiclassical context of these two approaches, equation of motion
versus effective action, see, e.g., the work of Hu and Parker (1978) versus Hartle and Hu (1979)
in [203, 115, 158, 159, 124, 3, 4]. See also comments in Sec. 5.6 of [169
] on the black hole backreaction
problem comparing the approach by York et al. [297
, 298
, 299
] versus that of Sinha, Raval, and
Hu [264
].
The well known in-out effective action method treated in textbooks, however, led to equations of motion
which were not real because they were tailored to compute transition elements of quantum operators
rather than expectation values. The correct technique to use for the backreaction problem is the
Schwinger–Keldysh closed-time-path (CTP) or ‘in-in’ effective action [257, 11, 184, 66, 272
, 42, 70].
These techniques were adapted to the gravitational context [76, 181, 40, 182
, 236, 57
] and
applied to different problems in cosmology. One could deduce the semiclassical Einstein equation
from the CTP effective action for the gravitational field (at tree level) with quantum matter
fields.
Furthermore, in this case the CTP functional formalism turns out to be
related [272
, 44
, 58
, 201, 112
, 54
, 55
, 216, 196, 208
, 206] to the influence functional formalism of Feynman
and Vernon [89
], since the full quantum system may be understood as consisting of a distinguished
subsystem (the “system” of interest) interacting with the remaining degrees of freedom (the environment).
Integrating out the environment variables in a CTP path integral yields the influence functional, from which
one can define an effective action for the dynamics of the system [44
, 167
, 156, 112]. This approach to
semiclassical gravity is motivated by the observation [148] that in some open quantum systems
classicalization and decoherence [303, 304, 305, 306, 180, 33, 279, 307, 109] on the system may be
brought about by interaction with an environment, the environment being in this case the matter fields and
some “high-momentum” gravitational modes [188, 119, 228, 149, 36, 37, 160, 293]. Unfortunately, since
the form of a complete quantum theory of gravity interacting with matter is unknown, we do not
know what these “high-momentum” gravitational modes are. Such a fundamental quantum
theory might not even be a field theory, in which case the metric and scalar fields would not be
fundamental objects [154
]. Thus, in this case, we cannot attempt to evaluate the influence action of
Feynman and Vernon starting from the fundamental quantum theory and performing the path
integrations in the environment variables. Instead, we introduce the influence action for an
effective quantum field theory of gravity and matter [78
, 77
, 79
, 80
, 263, 237, 238], in which
such “high-momentum” gravitational modes are assumed to have already been “integrated
out.”
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-2004-3 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |