| 1 | As stated above. Only very recently it was shown that Einstein had derived these equations as early as 1912, but did not bother to publish them [153]. | |
| 2 | A detailed description of optics in curved spacetimes and a derivation of the lens equation from Einstein’s field equations
can be found in Chapter 3 and 4 of [167 |
|
| 3 | In cosmology, the various methods to define distance diverge (see, e.g. Chapters 14.4 of [202 |
|
| 4 | Due to the fact that physical objects have a finite size, and also because at some limit wave optics has to be applied, in reality the magnification stays finite. | |
| 5 | This does not violate energy conservation, since this is the magnification relative to an “empty” universe
and not relative to a “smoothed out” universe. This issue is treated in detail in, e.g., [163] or in Chapter 4.5
of [167 |
|
| 6 | There exists a theorem that gravitational lenses should produce an odd number of images (e.g., [120]). | |
| 7 | This can be seen very simply: Imagine a lens situation like the one displayed in Figure 2 |
|
| 8 | Similarly, one cannot determine the temperature of a black body by measuring the energy of a single photon emitted by the black body, but one needs to measure a large number of them and compare with some underlying theory. | |
| 9 | A well-known exception is the light deflection at the solar limb, where the difference between the lensed and the unlensed positions of stars was used to confirm General Relativity, see Chapter 2. |
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-12 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |