The first written account of the deflection of light by gravity appeared in the “Berliner Astronomisches
Jahrbuch auf das Jahr 1804” in an article entitled: “Über die Ablenkung eines Lichtstrahls von seiner
geradlinigen Bewegung, durch die Attraktion eines Weltkörpers, an welchem er nahe vorbeigeht” (“On the
Deflection of a Light Ray from its Straight Motion due to the Attraction of a World Body which it Passes
Closely”) [175]. Johann Soldner – a German geodesist, mathematician and astronomer then
working at the Berlin Observatory – explored this effect and inferred that a light ray close
to the solar limb would be deflected by an angle
= 0.84 arcsec. It is very interesting to
read how carefully and cautiously he investigated this idea and its consequences on practical
astronomy.
In the year 1911 – more than a century later – Albert Einstein [50] directly addressed the influence of
gravity on light (“Über den Einfluß der Schwerkraft auf die Ausbreitung des Lichtes” (“On the Influence of
Gravity on the Propagation of Light”). At this time, the General Theory of Relativity was not
fully developed. This is the reason why Einstein obtained – unaware of the earlier result – the
same value for the deflection angle as Soldner had calculated with Newtonian physics. In this
paper, Einstein found
for the deflection angle of a ray grazing
the sun (here
and
are the mass and the radius of the sun,
and
are the
velocity of light and the gravitational constant, respectively). Einstein emphasized his wish that
astronomers investigate this question (“Es wäre dringend zu wünschen, daß sich Astronomen
der hier aufgerollten Frage annähmen, auch wenn die im vorigen gegebenen Überlegungen
ungenügend fundiert oder gar abenteuerlich erscheinen sollten.” (“It would be very desirable
that astronomers address the question unrolled here, even if the considerations should seem to
be insufficiently founded or entirely speculative.”) Recently it was discovered that Einstein
had derived the lens equation, the possibility of a double image and the magnifications of the
images in a notebook in the year 1912 [153
]. In 1913 Einstein even contacted the director of the
Mt. Wilson Observatory, George Ellery Hale, and asked him whether it would be possible to measure
positions of stars near the sun during the day in order to establish the deflection effect of the
sun.
See [51] to view a facsimile of a letter Einstein wrote to G.E. Hale on October 14, 1913. In the letter, Einstein asked Hale whether it would be possible to determine the light deflection at the solar limb during the day. However, there was a “wrong” value of the deflection angle in a sketch Einstein included in the letter.
There actually were plans to test Einstein’s wrong prediction of the deflection angle during a solar eclipse in 1914 on the Russian Crimea peninsula. However, when the observers were already in Russia, World War I broke out and they were captured by Russian soldiers [32]. So, fortunately for Einstein, the measurement of the deflection angle at the solar limb had to be postponed for a few years.
With the completion of the General Theory of Relativity, Einstein was the first to derive the correct
deflection angle
of a light ray passing at a distance
from an object of mass
as
In the following decades, light deflection or gravitational lensing was only very rarely the topic of a research
paper: In 1924, Chwolson [39
] mentioned the idea of a “fictitous double star” and the mirror-reversed
nature of the secondary image. He also mentioned the symmetric case of star exactly behind star, resulting
in a circular image. Einstein also reported in 1936 about the appearance of a “luminous circle” for perfect
alignment between source and lens [54
], and of two magnified images for slightly displaced
positions1.
Today such a lens configuration is called “Einstein-ring”, although more correctly it should be called
“Chwolson-ring”. Influenced by Einstein, Fritz Zwicky [210, 211] pointed out in 1937 that galaxies
(“extragalactic nebulae”) are much more likely to be gravitationally lensed than stars and that one can use
the gravitational lens effect as a “natural telescope”.
In the 1960s, a few partly independent theoretical studies showed the usefulness of lensing for
astronomy [95, 111, 112, 123, 146, 147
]. In particular, Sjur Refsdal derived the basic equations of
gravitational lens theory and subsequently showed how the gravitational lens effect can be used to
determine Hubble’s constant by measuring the time delay between two lensed images. He followed up this
work with interesting applications of lensing [149, 148, 150]. The mathematical foundation of how a light
bundle is distorted on its passage through the universe had been derived in the context of gravitational
radiation even before [157].
Originally, gravitational lensing was discussed for stars or for galaxies. When quasars were discovered in
the 1960s, Barnothy [14] was the first to connect them with the gravitational lens effect. In the late
60s/early 70s, a few groups and individuals explored various aspects of lensing further, for
example, statistical effects of local inhomogeneities on the propagation of light [71
, 72
, 143];
lensing applied to quasars and clusters of galaxies [42, 130, 158]; development of a formalism for
transparent lenses [30, 40]; and the effect of an inhomogeneous universe on the distance-redshift
relations [46].
But only in 1979 did the whole field receive a real boost when the first double quasar was discovered and
confirmed to be a real gravitational lens by Walsh, Carswell & Weymann [193
]. This discovery, and the
development of lensing since then, will be described in Section 4.
| http://www.livingreviews.org/lrr-1998-12 |
© Max Planck Society and the author(s)
Problems/comments to |