Post B2kLUo1OILmTngcev2 by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
 (DIR) More posts by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmfbhibMZBvk7cm by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
       2026-01-28T02:17:01.581524Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       a whole class of the old computers i like will become infinitely less usable under linux in particular the moment toolkits stop supporting X, and this is a genuine problem that should be taken seriously instead of saying "you should just buy shiny new AI-enabled razor thin bendable NPU thing and encourage the bastards ruining tech and just use wayland bro"
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmgqz5HBD3btq52 by freya@chaosfem.tw
       2026-01-28T02:20:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt fuck Wayland. It feels more like the windows graphics stack than anything else. local-first, assumed acceleration, can't just DISPLAY=ra:0 ./app, any Wayland rem oting is going to be full on remote desktop-style thing, not actual graphics remoting
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmhVOf1VR4wo74S by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
       2026-01-28T02:22:23.454804Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freya for me most of my rage towards it is due to the "security model" of it where you aren't allowed to do jack shit unless your specific compositor explicitly provisions for it and different compositors provision for it in different ways and there isn't even parity for local features like ICC profile loading
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmiHblm4RUTMcDY by freya@chaosfem.tw
       2026-01-28T02:22:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt what the fuck
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmix5HZFPZ6ljrk by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
       2026-01-28T02:24:42.272282Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freya BTW i *heavily* use X forwarding every single goddamn da on my LAN and so network transparency is probably the single biggest sticking point for me as well.Or it would be, but I use FVWM and ICC profiles and will give both up/cripple them under some form of wayland protocol wrapper over my dead body
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFmjx7Yus4fVnHYu by fiore@brain.worm.pink
       2026-01-28T13:30:33.967053Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt @freya i think  waypipe  provides this  on wayland  tho ?
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFms9T4tV867dFuy by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
       2026-01-28T02:25:03.851199Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freya oh yeah also keyboard remapping etc.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kFnbldTplnZWps9o by 20000lbs_of_Cheese@freeradical.zone
       2026-01-28T02:28:58Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt you're comparing wayland to fascist tech-bros pushing AI?
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kGBWJZP9Ubbw6tns by fiore@brain.worm.pink
       2026-01-28T13:35:18.247790Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt @freya like i  partially agree  w u  but like .  the state  of the  Xorg  server was  so so  bad  that  something had  to be done ?  and  i think the  fact that  waypipe works  plain better  than  ssh -X  (other ppls experience, not mine, sincr i dont use that feature)  rlly shows this
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kGWC5jmyAayHUxEG by fiore@brain.worm.pink
       2026-01-28T13:39:01.638044Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @freya @wyatt fwiw i really hope  toolkits dont drop  X11 support , even just for  compat reasons
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kLUo1OILmTngcev2 by wyatt@soc.megatokyo.moe
       2026-01-28T14:03:54.687286Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @fiore @freya > the state  of the  Xorg  server was  so so  bad  that  something had  to be done ?X12, maybe. wayland, no.to head people off, if you say "wayland is X12" i will decapitate youalso X11 continues to work for me so I don't know if that's actually true
       
 (DIR) Post #B2kLUp6OHFNH9TyALo by fiore@brain.worm.pink
       2026-01-28T14:34:47.066923Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt @freya i mean even  if it works  , the  state of the  xorg  codebases  is suboptimal . there is a  reason work on it  slowed down to a  crawland  while i agree, wayland is definitely not  an  x12, what makes you think  that  an eventual  x12 protocol  would have kept  backward compatibility with x11?  why would that  even be a  priority ? the  issues  x11  does  have  (because come on .  they are  there)  are really not  the implementations fault,  they are just a  consequence of its designas i said tho ,  i definitely agree that  toolkits  (esp qt and gtk) dropping  x11 support would be  one of the  dumbest ideas of this  era of  computing , that is for sure
       
 (DIR) Post #B2l1F6c9ay1wuI0wb2 by Erato_Heti@social.xenofem.me
       2026-01-28T19:27:54.582775Z
       
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @fiore @freya @wyatt oh true it is suboptimal. she cooked here. we have to move to something optimal. good call.
       
 (DIR) Post #B2lUtTgM98iehjaCtk by tomjennings@tldr.nettime.org
       2026-01-28T18:46:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @wyatt This wayland vs x thing is so stupid. I gotta assume most users are "like me" in that i tend to use older, stable cheap hardware, do minimal configuration of a mainstream distro (Debian, here) and are not stay far away from edges that could cut me. I only schematically understand the technical basis of wayland vs x. It does seem serious but so much does sound like bro behavior.