Post B1KdbjCquZfraFnFs8 by futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nz
(DIR) More posts by futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nz
(DIR) Post #B1KYLEDdr1Gl4fTYAa by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:04:05Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
"Councils will meet [the state-imposed rates cap], because they would be required to meet it under legislation. It will mean that we are saying no to our communities more often, and it will mean that we are deferring projects that they wanted to see go ahead.But that might be ok, if it means they've got more money in their back pocket, because their rates bills aren't rising at such a significant rate.#Tamah Alley, 2025https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/focusonpolitics?share=3ca9302f-cf98-42e3-b73c-a13df8cd06a5(1/2)#podcasts #RNZ #FocusOnPolitics
(DIR) Post #B1KYrXNq8WZfmKeTeS by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:09:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
"So that's going to be the tradeoff our communities face."#Tamah Alley, 2025https://www.rnz.co.nz/podcast/focusonpolitics?share=3ca9302f-cf98-42e3-b73c-a13df8cd06a5Where council services get cut, outside extractors will fund profit-seeking and rent-seeking businesses to take their place. Soaking up all that new money in their back pocket and more. Especially in places too small for a competitive market in public services formerly provided by councils. Made cheaper for the same reasons Pharmac made drugs cheapest public purchaser negotiation.(2/?)
(DIR) Post #B1KZWe5u5hnYSqre5I by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:17:20Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Worse the benefits of limiting rates and the costs imposed by public service cuts don't fall equally on everyone. Only property owners get a direct benefit, and ownership is heavily concentrated in 2025 NZ. The more properties someone owns, the more they end up with in their back pocket from limiting rates.(3/?)
(DIR) Post #B1KcIuR6pod6xMvNtQ by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:48:29Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Whereas fixed charges for using infrastructure and accessing services ("users pays") imposes a relatively higher cost on citizens the lower our incomes are.Say you lived on $1000 a week - just over a 40 hour minimum wage job in 2026 - and I took home $3000 a week - roughly a backbench MP salary - and we both got charged $10 for water. You'd be paying 3 times more of your income for the same water. (4/?)
(DIR) Post #B1KciviwfaJUTmfu8O by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:53:09Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Add that disparity to the uneven distribution of limiting rates, and that's a massive shift of the payment burden for those infrastructure and services. From from a property owning class and a salaried middle class (often the same people), to renters on lower incomes.Like almost everything NatACT First have done, it's taking from the poor to give to the rich. A Dark Side Robin Hood. Creating more poverty for purely ideological reasons. Disgraceful.(5/5)
(DIR) Post #B1Kcm1F8bcYMSwCoKW by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T06:53:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Add that disparity to the uneven distribution of limiting rates, and that's a massive shift of the payment burden for those infrastructure and services. From from a property owning class and a salaried middle class (often the same people), to renters on lower incomes.Like almost everything NatACT First have done, it's taking from the poor to give to the rich. A Dark Side Robin Hood. Creating more poverty for purely ideological reasons. Disgraceful.(5/5)
(DIR) Post #B1KdbjCquZfraFnFs8 by futuresprog@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T07:03:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
You’ve got quite a good explainer on rates in your thread.I think:Council rates need to go up because of inflation, otherwise we’re getting worse services.More services should be funded via income tax, otherwise the burden falls heavier on those on fixed incomes than on those currently employed who can afford it. @strypey
(DIR) Post #B1KgP7ODzEEUgXn84W by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T07:34:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
(1/2)@futuresprog> You’ve got quite a good explainer on rates in your threadThanks, good summary.> Council rates need to go up because of inflation, otherwise we’re getting worse servicesWhen you factor in inflation, the rates cap will effectively keep rates from rising *at all*. Despite years of being kept unsustainably low, given increasing populations, cost increases imposed by climate change, etc.
(DIR) Post #B1Kghc3ehYJ50tzOkq by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T07:37:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
(2/2)@futuresprog > More services should be funded via income taxTax in general. For reasons explained in a number of my recent threads about #LocalGovernment. Devolution of central govt responsibility to councils without ongoing funding being a *major* one.In at least one thread I proposed that central govt return 50% of income taxes derived from an area to local bodies, and take 50% of the rates take. Then they can devolve functions, cut targeted funding, and cap rates, all they like.
(DIR) Post #B1KuGL653J0dwx0qnY by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T09:58:42Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Sir Geoffrey Palmer is also concerned about the erosion of local democracy and towards the end of the interview he talks about giving local bodies guaranteed revenue sources other than rates; https://www.rnz.co.nz/national/programmes/saturday/audio/2019004103/sir-geoffrey-palmer-on-how-to-save-democracy(1/2)@futuresprog
(DIR) Post #B1LvLF4XAslhp99QUi by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-12-17T21:56:31Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Putting this together with Palmer's desire to protect and realise democratic ideals;https://mastodon.nzoss.nz/@strypey/115733870636990081I'd really like to see a federal constitution for Aotearoa, which reognises iwi and local bodies as sovereign within their own rohe. This could include localising the right to levy taxes. Leaving central government dependent on income from rates, and seeking funding from iwi and local bodies if it can't "live within its means" ; )(2/2)