Post B18dCpV42itpy0v7GC by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
(DIR) More posts by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
(DIR) Post #B13KwjoidPJgk7UVyy by Strandjunker@mstdn.social
2025-12-08T21:23:26Z
0 likes, 3 repeats
If you love freedom but don’t care if it applies to everyone, what you actually love is privilege.
(DIR) Post #B13KwlG3HGm5DBHrE0 by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-08T22:43:55.686266Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Strandjunker i think you're getting confused about basic definitions of words here.
(DIR) Post #B14VxisAvM4Al2jw36 by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-09T06:24:11Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski @Strandjunker Care to expand?
(DIR) Post #B14VxkLHScwTJbMh3Q by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-09T12:22:03.460522Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi @Strandjunker if i love [apples] but don't care if someone else has one, do i still love apples? there's nothing inherent in the definition of freedom that means you are obligated to care if someone else also enjoys said freedomthe word she is looking for is "empathy" you lack empathy. loving privilege would be something else. maybe you don't love the fact that you have freedom and someone else doesn't- you just don't care. the argument is a red herring, virtue signal, twists definitions and is just a basic leftist trash take
(DIR) Post #B17PmIO92G7TBKk0WG by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-10T21:46:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski The apple analogy doesn’t fit: apples are a preference, not a moral principle. Saying “nothing in the definition of freedom obligates me to care if others have it” treats freedom like apples, just a personal perk. But moral principles only hold if they apply universally. Wanting freedom only for yourself isn’t loving freedom; it *IS* loving privilege.And thanks for the closing ad-hominem. Makes the reply waaaay easier.
(DIR) Post #B17PmJaaZTfSuDZSYS by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-10T21:56:54.248264Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi this is just basic grammar, but it's more than that- it's a deceitful way for marxists to insert their class struggle nonsense into the concept of freedom. freedom doesn't mean everyone has to have the same amount of stuff, same intellect, same access to the resources you're trying to redistribute by changing definitions of words. that's nowhere in the definition of freedom. i recommend you invest in a dictionary. literally go look it up, it does not say "and everyone else has to have the exact same amount of stuff otherwise nobody is actually free, that's just pRiVIleGe" durrr you're a God damned retard. screw off. good bye
(DIR) Post #B17PqL4ezYfofaYUUq by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-10T21:57:40.130987Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi here though i'll look it up for you:
(DIR) Post #B17RPge6sdvBfAYW7U by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-10T22:11:25Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski You do you. We don't seem to have the same alignment here. I'm far from adding "and that's ok", but from your reactions it can be easily inferred that discussion is not something you're interested in. Just shouting. Bye.
(DIR) Post #B17RPhVdfcjuLBbGYS by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-10T22:15:14.633827Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi yes well sorry but i have no patience for marxists making bad faith arguments and twisting the definitions of words. do not tell me what "i love" (privilege) or try to dicatate what i should care about. freedom is something we should all pursue and if some people aren't free, that's unfortunate, but that doesn't mean i need to throw myself into a wood chipper to prove how virtuous i am.
(DIR) Post #B18dCpV42itpy0v7GC by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-10T22:19:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski LOLz
(DIR) Post #B18dCr38HXkGlxrq08 by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:55:02Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski Your reply opens by labeling the other side as “marxists” and “bad faith,” which shifts things away from the actual argument. That’s an ad hominem move: it attacks who you think the speaker is instead of what was said. It makes the discussion emotional rather than logical and doesn’t address the point about freedom at all.
(DIR) Post #B18dCryuohxxfAtz4C by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:55:28Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski Saying “don’t tell me what I love or what I should care about” reframes the original point. No one dictated your feelings; the argument was: if a value applies only to you, it stops being a principle and becomes privilege. That’s not a command, it’s a definition of how moral claims work. You’re arguing against something that wasn’t said.
(DIR) Post #B18dCsqRbgmgLBwjVA by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:55:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski You say “freedom is something we should all pursue,” which actually supports the universality point. If freedom is something all should pursue, then it isn’t just a private preference. But if you also say you don’t care whether others have it, that contradicts the idea that freedom is a universal good. Those two claims don’t fit together.
(DIR) Post #B18dCu2XAE362ybtz6 by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:56:08Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski Bringing up “throw myself into a wood chipper” is a huge leap. Caring about others’ freedom doesn’t require extreme self-sacrifice. That exaggeration turns a simple moral point into an impossible demand. It creates a false choice between total self-destruction and total indifference, which isn’t what anyone argued.
(DIR) Post #B18dCuj4c44oAuVsI4 by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:56:35Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski Your response expresses frustration clearly, but it doesn’t engage the actual claim. It uses labels, exaggerations, and restatements of things no one said. The core idea remains unaddressed: if you value a freedom only when it benefits you, that’s not a universal principle, it’s a personal advantage. Calling that out isn’t dictating your feelings; it’s clarifying terms.
(DIR) Post #B18dCviOw38JF7Cqsi by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-11T12:01:59.306950Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi my man, find a server with a higher character limit. freedom is a state of being. you're trying to reframe it through a marxist class lens that turns rights into privileges. i do not "love privilege" and reject this premise. the next logical step is having that privilege taken and redistributed to those you deem less fortunate or more deserving based on whatever criteria you assign to divide people into haves and have-notsrights are inherent. privieges are easily given and taken away. i am not your slave and i am not playing this game.
(DIR) Post #B18dD3voO4c6j1XftY by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T07:57:10Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski The blessing and the curse of the free™ internet is that anyone can speak, and anyone can shout. You rarely know people’s motives here, and sadly it’s not unreasonable to assume some of it is driven by bad faith or hidden agendas. But one thing stays true: those who yell the loudest usually have the weakest argument. I’m tired of watching people mistake volume for victory. Declaring yourself the winner isn’t winning, it’s just smelling your own farts.
(DIR) Post #B18dfS1KQ0mtXnevqK by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T12:05:43Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski You decided to interact with me. You don’t have to. It’s your right.
(DIR) Post #B18dfTXclQDQGFmEoy by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-11T12:07:16.043310Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi actually i replied to a slimy post by someone else about checking my privilege, and you then replied to that. i am surprised anyone on the mastodon side of fedi doesn't have my instance blocked. but carry on
(DIR) Post #B18gWhSDxym0fRl4vA by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T12:34:41Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski How does it feel? It’s no secret that insecure keyboard-warriors often times get the superiority dopamine hit when being “treated like that” by ‘the libtards’ or ‘leftists’ or (as you like to say) ‘marxists’. Personally would not like to get to that position where it feels so lonely that I have to admit that people should cut me off.Oh and clearly you meant “everyone”. You’re welcome ;)
(DIR) Post #B18gWimT2CYmmWEl72 by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-11T12:39:17.945312Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi this is not a productive conversation. learn basic grammar
(DIR) Post #B18gyKQhAINvMlDXrU by MichalBryxi@mastodon.world
2025-12-11T12:42:45Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski As someone with such a high value for their time as you knows: You can always eject from said conversation and decide to not engage. As someone thriving on having conflict with strangers online as you knows: You hate the idea of not having the last word.
(DIR) Post #B18gyLZauh66ueOAN6 by meowski@fluf.club
2025-12-11T12:44:17.783396Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@MichalBryxi having the last word when you're going in circles doesn't really matter. best of luck though