Post B05iZw4LwMYuUbpexU by koteisaev@mastodon.online
(DIR) More posts by koteisaev@mastodon.online
(DIR) Post #AzxOPyCfF0z07LQx3w by khm@hj.9fs.net
2025-11-06T03:58:15Z
1 likes, 4 repeats
Let's hop on a call about it. Just a quick Teams meeting. Let's huddle it on Slack. We can chat about it on Hive. Hit me on Troop. Got time for a Webex? Jump on a Zoom. Let's task it on Chanty. Get on Flock with me. Send a message on Rocket. We'll workshop it on Ryver. Link me on Pumble. Log into my Discord server. Shoot me a message on Matrix. We'll do Google Chat. ProofHub me. Upbase me. Wrike me. Asana me. Notion me. Let's talk on Viva Engage.
(DIR) Post #Azxf0R3t1R0bJOjogK by m0xEE@breloma.m0xee.net
2025-11-06T07:08:19.403429Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@khmAll of them at the same time? :marseyveryworried:Ha-ha-ha, Sametime — wasn't it some IBM chat thing?
(DIR) Post #B05hRQmqGQNpCX1SJk by strypey@mastodon.nzoss.nz
2025-11-10T04:13:17Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@khm This is the problem having an open standard for online chat is meant to solve. We have at least 2; XMPP and Matrix, and most chat services don't interoperate over either. Why? IMHO it's because you can justify much higher stock valuations if you can credibly promise to win the zero-sum battle to be the One Ring. And startup founders and early employees are paid for some or all of their early stage work in stock options.#chat #enshittification
(DIR) Post #B05iZw4LwMYuUbpexU by koteisaev@mastodon.online
2025-11-10T04:25:59Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@strypey @khm As I see Cory Doctorow explianed it better. Basically, there is no law on communication software to be interoperable. If there was such law for software with like 100K+ monthly active people "aboard" to be interoperable with any other such software, with penalties for not doing so, it would become more lucrative for these chat/collaboration software to be interoperable via 1-3 protocols used by everyone for "federated" communication.1/2