Post AoIRFfbZPvhaMlHMIa by tivasyk@mastodon.social
 (DIR) More posts by tivasyk@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #AoH7JSn2oQR3XRDXTE by m0xee@social.librem.one
       2024-11-21T17:59:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sunfish For me it's also the complete loss of control — systems can be insanely complex, but it would still not impossible to figure out how it works, given necessary time, but neural network is something infinitely complex, not cleated consciously, but by feeding it amounts of data that are even hard to measure, without making conscise choices about what data it is and without understanding how every piece of that data changes it.
       
 (DIR) Post #AoH7MdXxHAQ3lgflnk by m0xee@social.librem.one
       2024-11-21T18:00:26Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sunfish I do understand how neural networks can be applicable as a "unit" you can use in your software as it is with OCR for example (also the data used to train it wouldn't be random in this case), but when you use the neural network to design the "control unit" itself — it is, like I said, complete loss of said control.
       
 (DIR) Post #AoIRD7xlWhZjRqRqxU by freddy@social.security.plumbing
       2024-11-21T16:59:15Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @sunfish wait, is this essentially "I like doing hard puzzles. Of course I don’t want to make them simple"?!
       
 (DIR) Post #AoIRFfbZPvhaMlHMIa by tivasyk@mastodon.social
       2024-11-21T20:00:10Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       #quote | «What keeps the software alive are the programmers who have an accurate mental model (theory) of how it is built and works».https://www.baldurbjarnason.com/2022/theory-building/