Post AjLsbhEDfulewxMmKe by Erebus_Amauro@ohai.social
 (DIR) More posts by Erebus_Amauro@ohai.social
 (DIR) Post #AjLrvZzOCSUiKrLZDc by Radical_EgoCom@mastodon.social
       2024-06-27T11:40:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       How to argue against this: You say you want to ban fascism because it's harmful, but that's hypocritical of you because one could advocate for the banning of your ideology, communism, on the same grounds because it to has caused just as much harm.Rebuttal: That's a false equivalency. Despite both ideologies having been used by people to cause harm, whereas fascism is inherently harmful at its core, communism is not, and in fact, had to be warped and misinterpreted by people to be used for harm
       
 (DIR) Post #AjLsbhEDfulewxMmKe by Erebus_Amauro@ohai.social
       2024-06-27T11:48:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Radical_EgoCom Then, it starts again with something like "but communism" + choose anything from the black book of communism to some idiotic infographic to some historical happening in which history has been rewritten or manipulated (i. e. Katyn, Paracuellos, etc), and from there, each time you respond they will react with another dozen of factoids, history rewrites or outright lies in what is almost a thing that burdens qith sealioning by one side and the fractal fallacy on the other.