Post Adfm1ApMbs3Zii0cKG by meowski@fluf.club
(DIR) More posts by meowski@fluf.club
(DIR) Post #AdfNPQLq2x9RxifK5Y by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T10:20:09.410932Z
1 likes, 2 repeats
It sounds nice, but congress is so powerful, going after them is nearly impossible. Which is why they openly engage in corruption.Probably the only way to really challenge the power of congress is to expand it. For example to one congressman per 100 citizens.The existing congress would fight this to the death, but the president could win by forming a "faux congress" within the executive branch whose debates and votes inform vetos and executive orders.The involvement of the public would undermine the power of the de-jour congress to resist and eventually they would be supplanted.
(DIR) Post #AdfP1KWeFqAGqvMPse by FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T10:38:13.307785Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The way I understand this works is that "corruption" cannot be eliminated. Its a feedback-loop of power, and the only rational behavior is to accept corruption to a certain level.However, it must be documented and tracked to make corruption very obvious and undeniable. Then we go from there.Black markets, corruption, all forms of lawbreaking and scheming is Industry, it must be treated as such. Individuals who deny the facts about them must be LOCKED UP in a mental asylum. These people, by the millions and billions are the problem, these are the enablers.
(DIR) Post #AdfPwhH2LkBTuYPfsm by FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T10:48:35.702009Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
In Illinois, the Constitution has to change or the state going to sink into a financial abyss. The pension system, the nearly 7,000 thousand taxing authorities are only part of the problem - the welfare system paying for the vote of the dumbest shitheads is another. The labor and teacher unions are more of the same. All this must change, or else.We could tolerate SOME of these entities, but for the last 50 years these entities are growing not shrinking.Other places have more less the same issues, and this must be as clear as day to everyone.
(DIR) Post #AdfQCvvDek4dyUwyBM by pyrate@nicecrew.digital
2024-01-09T10:51:32.235399Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Look, the horrors would end if you were just more racist.
(DIR) Post #AdfQZqNgQIa7RzBkh6 by FourOh-LLC@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T10:55:40.490152Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The inner-city black slave who is still on the plantation by choice, or the over-educated female who cannot go through a day without creating a PAC are a problem, yes. Same with the Communist shitheads, the fanatic Muslims and all the other elements who do not deserve to live in a Republic.If we ever fix this the process will be very painful.
(DIR) Post #AdfRDiKdliy04OmE9Q by pyrate@nicecrew.digital
2024-01-09T11:02:53.567326Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Ever consider that this whole process is by design? The intention was to flood our society with infinity negroids and over-educated females who disregard procreation. All of this was engineered by subversive and parties hostile to an American nation mirroring European values. Instead our tolerance, charity, empathy, and so on have all been weaponized against us.
(DIR) Post #AdfXkkgCezKGdI02BE by Java@freeatlantis.com
2024-01-09T12:16:05Z
1 likes, 1 repeats
@cjd $68 million! Has she paid the college tuition back that she stole? Whores, pedos, and commies, oh my.
(DIR) Post #AdfkOkSk5Ma6zbXdgG by meowski@fluf.club
2024-01-09T14:37:45.102692Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd > the only way to really challenge the power of congress is to expand it.so, when a government body is corrupt, make it bigger? this is asinine. the way to fix corruption in congress and elsewhere is to actually, you know, PROSECUTE CRIME with existing laws. that involves regaining control over the DoJ and federal law enforcement- not expanding congress. please think before posting ty.
(DIR) Post #AdfktlKOuxWQebQd9s by unlight@freespeechextremist.com
2024-01-09T14:43:21.859313Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@meowski @cjd not a lot of lawyers out there willing to slam their dick in the door of potentially being disbarred for prosecuting "the wrong politician." what's particularly pernicious is that we see this thing with orange man and all of the phony cases against him while honest to goodness criminals run rampant. the illusion of holding the "powerful" to account without exactly doing anything is a feature, not a bug, of the current power hegemony. those guys care more about a payout than they care about the letter of the law, so shit like Burisma just continues unabated.but you're absolutely right to assert that expanding government to shrink corruption is a single digit IQ move. it's like asking for more regulations because Amazon got away with murder on taxes and abusing the USPS. like, no, enforcing more regs won't solve the problem... lol
(DIR) Post #AdflSrWhrcJ40tvBRY by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T14:49:42.208426Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
> expanding government to shrink corruption"Expanding government" means bigger budgets.Expanding congress means more people voting, so it's more costly & difficult to buy off 50% of them.
(DIR) Post #Adfle3medFQTDKiieW by meowski@fluf.club
2024-01-09T14:51:43.155189Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@unlight @cjd the size of congress is definitely not the problem. the DoJ and FBI refusing to investigate and prosecute crime (and instead focusing on political witch hunts like the trump lawfare and persecuting J6 protestors) is the problem. lawyers and states attorneys know better than to step out of line due to corrupt judiciary and law enforcement, and also because so many of them are on the take (soros funded activists for example)
(DIR) Post #Adflhgmm52DH2rVUZs by unlight@freespeechextremist.com
2024-01-09T14:52:25.069187Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd @meowski I don't know about you but I'm paying these bastards far too much for far too little representation. paying them more in some bloated, failed effort at reining in a government that's already out of control is like throwing kerosene on a fire to put it out
(DIR) Post #Adfm1ApMbs3Zii0cKG by meowski@fluf.club
2024-01-09T14:55:54.062332Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd @unlight it won't work like that. if you dilute their voting power by making more of them, you dilute the value of each vote, thus making it less costly to bribe each one. the lobbyists doing the bribing have vast wealth and congress critters and even our president have demonstrated they will sell us out for relatively small amounts of moneyagain, the key here is to prosecute crime and deter bribery from happening in the first place
(DIR) Post #AdfoVYQVdJgrVVzvVo by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T15:23:48.236820Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
New Hampshire has a huge state house for the number of residents. It ends up working to their benefit because pretty much everybody personally knows (and can attest to the moral character of) at least one rep, if not more.
(DIR) Post #Adg8KdmdNGsS1FQ67s by itchimodo@freeatlantis.com
2024-01-09T19:05:21Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Java @cjd you might want take pedos off that listresearch shows they are not the cause of the problem
(DIR) Post #AdgDYJ8nQ345p37eAS by unlight@freespeechextremist.com
2024-01-09T20:04:27.799339Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd @meowski don't mean to shift the goalposts on you here but consider the futility in trying to appeal to the morality of the average Californianthe point of trying to further provide franchise to the average citizen of any given county, state, etc. has a multiplicative effect of a rather predictable, yet unfortunate disenfranchisement. so long as lobbying exists, so too will the tendrils of government seek a codependent relationship for its consolidation of further power against the will of the public. that 1:100 ratio of representation makes it easier to lobby, bribe, and so forth. regrettable, but predictable. NH may very well be a microcosm of an upstanding people (as a cynic and looking at how Haley is running the board there, I certainly doubt this) yet if we apply that to the rest of the union, you see how dark this becomesthere is a check and a balance in place, expanding state houses, senates etc. without enforcement of the legal systems which currently exist, it would just earn more ire from the people engaging in an even more crafty illusion of choice. their taxes go up, they aren't represented appropriately and the wheel turnssomeone's got to prosecute the bad guys is all, otherwise there is no distinction between bad guy and good guy
(DIR) Post #AdgGONfW1vKkpcNugi by cjd@pkteerium.xyz
2024-01-09T20:36:14.768810Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
Ok so the "democracy is shit" argument is a reasonable one, but where you're going isn't a question of a large elected congress vs. a small one, what you want is a dictator.A wise and generous dictator seems such an obvious hack around the problems of democracy, you might wonder why we are still laboring like cretins in our broken democracies.The question is even more compelling given Plato extolled the virtues of a dictatorship some 2400 years ago and has been read by billions of people since.The real reason why dictatorship never produces a utopia is because of a fatal game theoretical flaw which I won't attempt to explain because CGP Gray has done better than I can ever hope to in his short video "Rules For Rulers". Look it up on YT.
(DIR) Post #AdgGtgIaoTJ1abaVw8 by meowski@fluf.club
2024-01-09T20:41:54.545659Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd @unlight who's advocating for dictatorship? what about a direct democracy moderated by a super intelligent machinea representative democracy isn't a bad system in theory as long as there is integrity and people are acting in good faithany system can be corrupted if it's allowed to rot the way ours has been
(DIR) Post #AdgNEXGeBbFjNx0O0G by unlight@freespeechextremist.com
2024-01-09T21:52:56.418960Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@cjd @meowski I want equal justice under the law. I'm an American so I revile concepts of monarchy on principlethat isn't dictatorial, that would be the function of the letter and spirit of the law. what we have today is differential enforcement of those laws.we have a system that works, it just has to be used appropriately. this isn't a moral argument, it's an objective argument.Plato also wrote the Republic and wrote about his abhorrence for direct democracy, so I guess there's that? I'm not necessarily interested in appealing to ethics which find misapplication in systems that won't function for the majority of a population, but the point of the forms is a critique on the concentration of subjectivity