Post AbvhzzSwTOdNpgKdhQ by hellpie@raru.re
 (DIR) More posts by hellpie@raru.re
 (DIR) Post #AbvgpWLTms0EfRHjma by EC_OSPO@social.network.europa.eu
       2023-11-18T11:28:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       This is from 16 November:https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_23_5739 "The winners are expected to release the developed models under an open-source license for non-commercial use."
       
 (DIR) Post #AbvhGpUCjLvtqlO6vg by EC_OSPO@social.network.europa.eu
       2023-11-18T11:33:44Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @modulux this might need some more digging.  https://aiboost-project.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/AI-BOOST-_Guidelines-for-Applicants.pdf
       
 (DIR) Post #AbvhzzSwTOdNpgKdhQ by hellpie@raru.re
       2023-11-18T11:41:53Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @EC_OSPO "or through publishing their research findings" so it's just going to be yet another deluge of incomplete whitepapers with missing details and completely random looking graphs, and no models.
       
 (DIR) Post #AbxZeEDKY3wpsx3sZM by amarok@mastodonczech.cz
       2023-11-18T12:58:34Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @moduluxThe term "open source" is often misunderstood. Open source may be libre software, a license similar to GPL or Apache or another. But it may as well be open source in the sense of viewable source code and limited rights to re-use.@EC_OSPO
       
 (DIR) Post #AbxZeFDio5r50SFhom by marcel_kolaja@mastodon.pirati.cz
       2023-11-19T09:17:49Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @amarok @modulux @EC_OSPO No, the latter is not Open Source. https://opensource.org/osd/
       
 (DIR) Post #AbxbLVpd1PoOvqB7wG by amarok@mastodonczech.cz
       2023-11-19T09:36:52Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @marcel_kolajaIf we are talking about such a specific "open source" license model, then yes, point 6 "The license must not restrict anyone from making use of the program in a specific field of endeavor." - however this is the OpenSource Initiative, not to be confused with open source in general. I can distribute my own open source software and explicitly disallow commercial use.@modulux @EC_OSPO
       
 (DIR) Post #Ac1T2tNFFKQfRZLtui by unexpectedteapot@social.linux.pizza
       2023-11-19T18:27:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @amarok There is no legal definition of open source software. The whole point of the OSI is to define "open-source."You may keep redefining freedom and openness till it is completely diluted out of meaning, but in the meanwhile "free software" refers to FSF's definition and "open-source" refers to OSI's definition for everyone online, and for good reasons.
       
 (DIR) Post #Ac1T2uAAJRYptIEyAK by marcel_kolaja@mastodon.pirati.cz
       2023-11-21T06:22:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @unexpectedteapot @amarok There are actually multiple legal definitions of Open Source Software :-) Nevertheless, if we’re not speaking in a context of a particular law, Open Source Software is indeed generally understood as software meeting the OSI definition, as OSI is the organization that defined the term in first place.
       
 (DIR) Post #Ac22Xou1Pw0cwtANU0 by unexpectedteapot@social.linux.pizza
       2023-11-21T13:00:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @marcel_kolaja I wasn't aware that a particular definition of open source software was enshrined into any national (or EU) law. Can you please link it? I tried to look it up, but mostly came up with legal guides referring to the terms of licences and/or OSI's definition.