Post AXf6Qftz7HjG9p39MG by tsetiady@mastodon.social
(DIR) More posts by tsetiady@mastodon.social
(DIR) Post #AXf6Qf7Q1qsfjCKMeu by tsetiady@mastodon.social
2023-07-13T12:00:26Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The problem with people wanting moreΒΉ privacy on #mastodon / #fediverse, is that the standart itself is not excatly designed to πππ₯ππππ§π that, #activitypub was created with an apporach to standardize an open system/interoperability firstΒ² and then addΒ³ many many boundariesβ΄ later when needed.ΒΉ it's not wrong, btwΒ² as opposed to π€πππππ ππππππ social mediaΒ³ so much software βππππππππ needed to achieve thisβ΄ potentially will break the compatibility in the network
(DIR) Post #AXf6Qftz7HjG9p39MG by tsetiady@mastodon.social
2023-07-13T12:05:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The funny thing is if we go hard on the privacy side of remaking social media, we will eventually ended up ππ-πππ£πππ‘πππ closed system social media (a la walled garden) *gasp*So it's not that smart either to do that. π
(DIR) Post #AXf6QgfqFM0gYFRMx6 by tsetiady@mastodon.social
2023-07-13T12:12:22Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
The idealistic goal for #activitypub standard is not maximum #privacy but optimal privacy, so there's a maximum interoperability amongs many platforms
(DIR) Post #AXf6QhOrXy1SnsVK7s by tsetiady@mastodon.social
2023-07-13T12:18:54Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
Theoritically If #threads ends up joining #fediverse via #activitypub open protocol, we will have choice to optimize the privacy by not using their software /spyware app, and use opensource software instead
(DIR) Post #AXfCxeTa2Qw714o6hk by PublicLewdness@freespeechextremist.com
2023-07-13T21:10:31.196478Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@tsetiady Something FOSS wouldn't be a walled garden because if someone felt it was too privacy orienented they could fork it to be what they want.