Post AV65fRcPKOU96aKQtc by meadowhawk@indieweb.social
 (DIR) More posts by meadowhawk@indieweb.social
 (DIR) Post #AV60AY4yl0hMOZ8o1A by dave@social.masto.land
       2023-04-28T01:48:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Activitypub already exists. Why not just work on that? Why is this needed?https://github.com/bluesky-social/atproto/issues/255
       
 (DIR) Post #AV651CIGsytPzciccK by deepthoughts10@infosec.exchange
       2023-04-28T02:42:17Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave there’s no glory in making someone else’s project better. You have to invent something new. We are a society of narcissists. 😐
       
 (DIR) Post #AV65fRcPKOU96aKQtc by meadowhawk@indieweb.social
       2023-04-28T02:49:36Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave been asking the same question...  Looking over the code a little..looks like another way to do the same thing...🥱
       
 (DIR) Post #AV6I72rk9MqhtWQg1A by jmalone@mastodon.social
       2023-04-28T05:09:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave I quite liked pfrazee’s reply. Concise, listed the design decisions and addressed the likely motive behind the question.
       
 (DIR) Post #AV6kaBtUSZz90dvsBM by MetalSamurai@mas.to
       2023-04-28T10:28:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @dave None of the claimed reasons stand up to scrutiny. Allegedly they can’t use AcivityPub because real account portability is paramount. And yet, there is only one node (not even a second for testing or proof of concept), their Distributed ID system is just a placeholder implementation (that likely doesn’t actually work, hence one node), but  the “real” DID system will probably be revealed as reskinned NFTs.