Post ASsqdMHA7UULG4pMeG by phenlix@mastodon.online
 (DIR) More posts by phenlix@mastodon.online
 (DIR) Post #ASsqdMHA7UULG4pMeG by phenlix@mastodon.online
       2023-02-20T21:39:54Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       It's a common complaint that distributing CommonLisp application in the presence of FFI dependencies is difficult, so here's my attempt to make things a little easier.Code: https://github.com/sionescu/sbcl-goodies/releasesBlog: https://blog.cddr.org/posts/2023-02-20-distributing-binaries-cl-ffi/#sbcl #commonlisp #ffi
       
 (DIR) Post #ASsqdN1xJVv1bCijaK by galdor@emacs.ch
       2023-02-20T21:45:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @phenlix Interesting idea. I would add a big bold warning: statically linking libraries can have serious implications depending on the license of the libraries you are using.
       
 (DIR) Post #ASsr95kb5zn5Gyj97I by phenlix@mastodon.online
       2023-02-20T21:51:28Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @galdor True, but in this case it's generally considered legally safe to statically link OpenSSL, and libfixposix is MIT.