Posts by phenlix@mastodon.online
(DIR) Post #ASsqdMHA7UULG4pMeG by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-02-20T21:39:54Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
It's a common complaint that distributing CommonLisp application in the presence of FFI dependencies is difficult, so here's my attempt to make things a little easier.Code: https://github.com/sionescu/sbcl-goodies/releasesBlog: https://blog.cddr.org/posts/2023-02-20-distributing-binaries-cl-ffi/#sbcl #commonlisp #ffi
(DIR) Post #ASsr95kb5zn5Gyj97I by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-02-20T21:51:28Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@galdor True, but in this case it's generally considered legally safe to statically link OpenSSL, and libfixposix is MIT.
(DIR) Post #ASweBLT36rl9pF6SEC by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-02-22T17:45:04Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@galdor CCL's compiler is no longer much faster. Compilation times of SBCL used to be 400% over CCL ten years ago, it's now down to maybe 10-20% more. For example, on my laptop IOlib compiles from scratch in 7.7s on CCL and 8.9s on SBCL, +15.4%.
(DIR) Post #ATHT1ksFI58pe9KQKG by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-03-04T18:49:00Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@galdor I'll post as soon as I have it. I was already expecting to manage some sort of fork of SBCL and I don't think it's that difficult.
(DIR) Post #AVsn4YgiAHekhVNFMO by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-05-21T14:42:08Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@galdor It's not the source being centralised, it's forcing developers to personally vet the packages instead of relying on a curated list, as Quicklisp does.
(DIR) Post #AW0pQCUX7q01P4nwoa by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-05-25T11:46:07Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@louis @amszmidt @ksaj @larsbrinkhoff @ramin_hal9001 @rml See https://hachyderm.io/@lispegistus/110428797171924732
(DIR) Post #Aac1NcEavkGTTKBoFE by phenlix@mastodon.online
2023-10-10T01:52:52Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@louis @dekkzz76 What version of Clisp did you use ? Bordeaux-threads most definitely supports it.