Post APrNa36q2G3FEv8x9M by Allunar@chudbuds.lol
 (DIR) More posts by Allunar@chudbuds.lol
 (DIR) Post #APrNa36q2G3FEv8x9M by Allunar@chudbuds.lol
       2022-11-22T11:08:18.424748Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Sperg post on Kiwifarms and doxing:The only people that I believe should be held accountable for a doxing is the doxer(s) and potentially as well anyone who could be considered an accomplice or directly part of the op, though I do think there are exceptions like for example J Aubrey's involvement in the JustDestiny dox, I think he's fine to move past that.I think the key here is to establish the difference between doxing and posting previously doxed information. I would describe doxing as having 3 main stages:- Stage 1: The actual doxing, usually takes place in private, discord, google hangouts, skype, etc.- Stage 2: The initial posting of the dox, usually on sites like the so called "site zero".- Stage 3: Reposting of the now publicly available information, which is what certain Kiwifarmers are guilty of. Obviously there comes a point where doxed information might become so mainstream that this isn't even applicable anymore, say in the case of Pyrocynical's face or Mister Metokur's name.Basically my stance is if somebody posts now already doxed information (stage 3) to your site I don't think you have any obligation to police it to avoid responsibility.On the other hand IF hypothetically Kiwifarms marketed itself as being for posting doxes to (like "site zero" does) it could be held accountable, especially if it was established as being the medium for stage 2 doxing as described above.I think a large part of the problem here is that once information gets out there it's very hard to contain, people post doxed information to Twitter, Reddit, and even YouTube all the time and nobody gives a fuck, it's the same principle really.