Post AMrk3UtDd81Uc4ef4a by Macroz@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) More posts by Macroz@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #AMrk3UtDd81Uc4ef4a by Macroz@fosstodon.org
       2022-08-24T19:58:41Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       I was reading the #freesoftware  definition and it's curiously licensed CC4 Attribution *NoDerivatives*. If software should be free as in freedom, and even its manuals must be free, then why is this text so nonfree?https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html
       
 (DIR) Post #AMrk3WUTg5Q9Zv5vmq by Macroz@fosstodon.org
       2022-08-24T20:00:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Another question that came to my mind is that if manuals must be free, as other kinds of works of practical use too, then how can training material be nonfree, or are all people who arrange commercial courses about #freesoftware and don't publish their materials / videos wrong?