Post AFGiXKPqfc5N3IY9Wi by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
(DIR) More posts by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
(DIR) Post #AFGiXKPqfc5N3IY9Wi by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
2022-01-09T15:58:40Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
#Capitalism is the #dictatorship of the capitalist class - Ben Norton @thegrayzone and thus a rule of the majority, by the minority.
(DIR) Post #AFGioQWvBvZowC0liS by amerika@noagendasocial.com
2022-01-09T16:01:47Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone still not as bad as diversity
(DIR) Post #AFGlwtCwkeeo3kOZ0q by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
2022-01-09T16:36:55Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@thegrayzone The [western, U.S.] state is ruled by the #dictatorship of the #capitalist class. - Ben Norton
(DIR) Post #AFVYN5IG1BGqcphqTI by globalist@mas.to
2022-01-16T19:45:24Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone the minority should rule, it's way better than where minority does. Capitalism gives way more freedom
(DIR) Post #AFVbqMH0GZozY0lo2q by globalist@mas.to
2022-01-16T20:24:19Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone the minority should rule, it's way better than where majority does. Capitalism gives much more freedom
(DIR) Post #AFXaHCV8tYQjT0yWBM by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
2022-01-17T19:16:11Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@globalist @thegrayzone How is freedom and minority rule compatible?
(DIR) Post #AFYLsnU933R4jMwCky by globalist@mas.to
2022-01-18T04:09:38Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone with having the rule of majority an individual has an entire plebeian mass over them, they’re ruled by “everyone”. On the other hand, with the rule of minority, an individual is ruled by a few and has much more freedom, especially if it is a progressive minority with “aristocracy of the soul”. That is, rule of many can easily be tyranny and rule of a few is not necessary to be so.
(DIR) Post #AG8Hc4N3VRYTGpk7vM by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
2022-02-04T12:11:24Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@globalist @thegrayzone You're right. Majority rule can also be a mob rule, whereas a minority could theoretically impose a utopia on everyone, giving way for indulging one's passion. Yet isn't an individual always also a part of everyone? Thus, by "being ruled" by everyone, an individual's actually ruled by no one in particular, thus they've much more everyday individual freedom, because power's decentralized in the hands of so many, that there's no single power greater than any one part of it?
(DIR) Post #AG8iMOAlkt4bAF0V2O by globalist@mas.to
2022-02-04T17:11:06Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone this would work only in the case of any collectivism being eliminated and society atomized. Otherwise there will just some groups appear and become a new center of power. Hierarchical structure is natural and always crops up unless complete person’s autonomy possible.
(DIR) Post #AGLGGcfS6WvYi8RhTc by mareklach@mastodon.xyz
2022-02-10T14:04:44Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@globalist @thegrayzone > hierarchical structure is natural...What does "natural" mean tho? Even in nature you can have cases of a cat helping a squirrel, or a bear helping a bird... are these occurrences not perfectly natural as well?As such the exercise of dominance seems to me depends on pure "will", that is a choice, which depends on a certain strength of character, or one's conviction...?
(DIR) Post #AGLGGdhyEeXHwEdE2a by globalist@mas.to
2022-02-10T15:44:46Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@mareklach @thegrayzone ..cases that don’t cancel the fact cat would eat it in most cases. It’s not even ‘help’ in human sense, rather ‘program bug’, it might mistaken it for its offspring or sth. Also, why rejecting dominance? For sake of idea and serving to a moral imperative? Even this sort of “anti-power” will is an act of domination and strength, ironically.