Post ADtOr0eFng57Uaehea by gruffymax@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) More posts by gruffymax@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #ADtF1WTNKiPZY4wRPM by xpil@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T10:17:32Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       #agree ? #disagree ?I do not touch JS at all so I cannot really relate...
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtFa2I1Xqsk4a5aoy by jrballesteros05@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T10:23:45Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil I don't know but the cover pages look like pretty similar to real life.
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtFxb6sFb40j56omO by floppy@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T10:28:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil This is a joke carried out really well. :)
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtOr0eFng57Uaehea by gruffymax@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T12:07:40Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil I can't comment on JS, but I do love O'Reilly books
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtRbpfAf0nmwPXTyy by braunne@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T12:38:28Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Read what it says at the bottom of the page at:https://www.devuan.org/Exactly my sentiment!@xpil
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtaPPnG9ZQjBLmmMy by bkhan@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T14:17:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil JS is good if you treat it more like a functional programming language. Avoid the object oriented parts and rely on functions, objects and promises.
       
 (DIR) Post #ADtkLHpgbFChaQ2HGC by rudolf@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T14:44:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil Wonderful!
       
 (DIR) Post #ADu7XqoHUB6Y1LCLku by squidrin@fosstodon.org
       2021-11-29T20:28:27Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpilI have an 800 page java basics bookI also have a 400 page C reference manual
       
 (DIR) Post #ADuFZnA0pC5cukncjg by binyamin@mas.to
       2021-11-29T21:58:23Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil Nah. The "good parts" of JS lie in the use-case, not in the language itself. And, just to note, including "node.js" in "JavaScript would be misleading. "node.js" builds on JavaScript.
       
 (DIR) Post #ADuFap3VGSuX56FKTY by binyamin@mas.to
       2021-11-29T21:58:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @xpil Nah. The "good parts" of JS lie in the use-case, not in the language itself. And, just to note, including "node.js" in "JavaScript" would be misleading. "node.js" builds on JavaScript.