Post ABCpkVfGs5Nmb17aNc by Splashd@noagendasocial.com
 (DIR) More posts by Splashd@noagendasocial.com
 (DIR) Post #ABCnhu67NEWbb3JBNA by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T03:09:23Z
       
       0 likes, 3 repeats
       
       @justinamash: "There’s no authority for this.This is legislative action that bypasses the legislative branch.If you care about representative government—if you’re consistent regardless of who’s president—then it doesn’t matter that you like the policy; this mandate is an abuse of power.#ClownInChief #Biden #COVID #vaccine #mandate #FUJB https://nitter.domain.glass/justinamash/status/1436055744659480576(H/T @bennyjohnson RT )
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCniUj1C523C7ml0K by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T03:09:29Z
       
       0 likes, 2 repeats
       
       >@AP:  'BREAKING: President Joe Biden to mandate all employers with more than 100 workers require COVID vaccinations or weekly virus tests. The new requirements would affect as many as 100 million people. apne.ws/1I51gM0 '"
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCoJdJ6FVhaWeN4qG by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T03:16:12Z
       
       0 likes, 3 repeats
       
       It's not quite as simple as that, unfortunately.  Congress has delegated legislative authority to the executive branch in the modern administrative regulatory state, and so the executive gets to make regulations which have the force of law, so long as it follows certain rules (codified in the Administrative Procedure Act).
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCojNL4F1aiWvZBUO by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T03:20:50Z
       
       0 likes, 3 repeats
       
       The Biden Administration is trying to bypass even those rules, citing the COVID "emergency." There's some debate in the legal academy as to whether the entire structure of the administrative regulatory state is even constitutional, given that it violates separation of powers principles by combining the legislative and executive power in one branch of government, but for the foreseeable future, we're stuck with it.  These executive orders are ripe for constitutional challenge on multiple grounds.
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCp47eLlf8Nx8Tk5Q by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T03:24:36Z
       
       0 likes, 2 repeats
       
       For further do analysis of what Biden is trying to do, see @techno_fog's article here:https://technofog.substack.com/p/the-unvaccinated-will-be-punished
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCpkVfGs5Nmb17aNc by Splashd@noagendasocial.com
       2021-09-10T03:32:15Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @darulharb As policies go, it shows all the forethought of the Afghanistan withdrawal debacle, though instead of screwing over a handful of displaced Americans, he's upped the ante to all of us. As a distraction, he effectively told the Afghanistan planners, "Hold my beer" and knocked it out of the conversation with this move.There is no way it will survive, but it bodes poorly as a trend to posit this as leadership. It is demented fascism...
       
 (DIR) Post #ABCuL7nCzOfz5cY5dA by Linnie@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T04:23:42Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @darulharb Wasn’t Justin Amash a rabid Trump hater?  Oh my, so he’s not happy with his new chosen dictator?  Shocked…Im just shocked! 😏
       
 (DIR) Post #ABDSSM3zj5Zbon1H96 by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T10:45:59Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Linnie Yep.  As an elected Republican member of Congress, Amash resigned from the GOP in 2019, switched to the Libertarian Party in 2020, and then decided not to run for a fifth term.  He endorsed the Libertarian presidential candidate Jo Jorgensen in 2020. 🙄
       
 (DIR) Post #ABDVxWMzkyqScfSZ28 by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T11:25:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @buglaw Not exactly.  Matal v. Tam (2017), a.k.a. "The Slants" case, ably presented at SCOTUS by @Roncoleman, dealt with the portion of the Lanham Act that prohibited registration of "disparaging" trademarks, finding that provision of trademark law to be unconstitutional under the First Amendment. The USPTO hadn't overreached, Congress had.
       
 (DIR) Post #ABDW8zLUMl6VftDttg by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T11:27:18Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @buglaw And in the other case I presume you're referring to, Weyerhauser vs. U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (2018), SCOTUS did the minimum necessary to correct the 5th Circuit's erroneous decision holding that USFWS' designation of endangered species' critical habitat was not judicially reviewable under the APA. On remand, the 5th Circuit punted the case back down to the district court level for further proceedings, 919 F.3d 963 (2019).
       
 (DIR) Post #ABDctqB6rq7wZt5ncW by darulharb@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T12:43:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       ^good 🙄
       
 (DIR) Post #ABDoYOZVVlpYKJ2qAa by Linnie@social.quodverum.com
       2021-09-10T14:53:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @darulharb Thank you Darul.  I remember him being vicious towards President Trump.