Post 9zpKoerM0qeLs7MvWS by _1751015@mastodon.host
 (DIR) More posts by _1751015@mastodon.host
 (DIR) Post #9zp1Ps6piQ3mb24np2 by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:16:43Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Capitalism's most credible defender is Mariana Mazzucato, an economist whose histories of - and vision for - a strong state that shapes and manages markets is today's most plausible vision for a future under capitalism.Mazzucato has been warning that we can't afford to squander this crisis the way we did with the 2008 collapse, talking about a future of "climate lockdowns" if we don't make a change:https://pluralistic.net/2020/09/23/overly-exuberant-youth/#mazzucato1/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1QSYkC7mDe1PbKC by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:16:53Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       In "Capitalism After the Pandemic" in Foreign Affairs, Mazzucato recounts how the current emergencies come from the ideological failures of neoliberalism, and lays out a program for "building back better."https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-10-02/capitalism-after-covid-19-pandemicShe lays out a vision for a post-disaster capitalism that's something like the post-War boom of pluralistic, shared prosperity, and something like the state-sponsored tech boom of the moonshot, in service to building a world that's safer and fairer.2/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1RWf4Qe3MeksaLg by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       After all, the current system isn't working. Congress and the Treasury made trillions available to prop up the economy during the crisis, and rather than going into the productive economy, almost all that money has been captured by the finance sector.Now, if the finance sector was then allocating capital to the real economy, maybe we'd have something. But mostly what the finance sector invests in is...the finance sector. In the UK, only 10% of commercial lending goes to nonfinancial firms.3/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1SDCWGflUaeqtJg by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:13Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       In the world's advanced economies, more than 60% of lending is real-estate based. The finance sector pumps money into the finance sector, creates bubbles, the bubbles burst, and we bail them out. Then they do it again. And again.In the real economy, large firms are gnawing off their own limbs, buying back more than $3T in their own stocks over a decade. Money gets spent goosing share prices, rather than R&D, training, new capital or higher wages. 4/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1T0OxLDpPBQ310K by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:22Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Thus do we lurch from crisis to crisis, and each time, the state intervenes to rescue the system, but not to change it. That's why, when the covid crisis struck, we had low-waged/gig workers who had no insurance and no sick leave.The rhetoric of shrinking the state that has been with us since the Reagan years was never serious. Instead, the state has shifted to subsidizing large firms whose core message is that governments are incompetent, but who profiteer off government innovations.5/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1TkWfqrKmEg0pQ8 by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:29Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Like Gilead, whose remdesivir drug came from $70.5m in federal R&D subsidy, costs $10/dose to produce, and sells in the USA for $3,120. But it's not just pharma that reaps enormous windfalls from public spending!Google's search algorithm was funded by the NSF. The US Navy developed GPS. DARPA created the internet, touchscreens, voice recognition and more. 6/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1UY3fgxqNrCpN9k by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:38Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The companies that commercialized these technologies get 'em for free, dodge their taxes, AND campaign against the very idea of government spending. They back a bizarre ideology that measures the economy with nonsensical measures like GDP.Under GDP, public school teachers are a drain on the system, while the educated citizens they turn out are not accounted for at all.7/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1VOVofZFqXYOaFE by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:17:47Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       And when Goldman Sachs got a $10b bailout, CEO Lloyd Blankfein was able to claim that his workers were "among the most productive in the world" because such a small number of people had generated $10b in income!Handing money out to companies with no strings attached doesn't improve the economy, it just lines the pockets of the finance sector. Congress's PPP loans cost $500b and saved 2.3m jobs - that's a cost of $500k per job! 8/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1WWFxMWA2qdVuF6 by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:18:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The $7T in stimulus has not resulted in any real, structural change that will avert the looming crises on our horizon. We need to stop doing corporate handouts and start structuring markets to deliver public benefit.* Develop a "people's vaccine" that is patent-free and can be made accessible to the whole planet* Reform wages, health benefits, sick-pay and worker control over workplaces9/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1XEBC3aUl4bcivY by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:18:07Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       * Give preference to payroll support over unemployment support, the latter having thrown 30m Americans out of work* When companies go bust, don't just bail them out - require an equity for the public* Ban companies that receive assistance from issuing exec bonuses, issuing dividends, doing share buybacks, debt-loading, using tax-havens, spending public money on lobbying or price-gouging10/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1YIHWI6lu5L5hx2 by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:18:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       * Publicly subsidized pharma should be "narrowly patented and easily licensable"* Issue a "people's dividend" where "the government takes a percentage of the wealth created with government investments, puts that money in a fund, and then shares the proceeds with the people"Since the 2010s, a lot of us have been wishing for a "return to normal." 11/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1Z65X6wtOYdrqD2 by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:18:25Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Normal isn't good enough. It was never good enough. Normal got us into this mess. We need to build back better: to create a moonshot for climate adaptation that uses a muscular, capable state to invest people and technologies.A moonshot that structures the economy to produce the clean energy, infrastructure creation and retrofitting, transit, universal health care (and other forms of care), universal network access - a future fit for the human race.12/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zp1ZuuIAVCiAY05Gi by pluralistic@mamot.fr
       2020-10-04T15:18:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Image: Molly Crabapple/Years of Repairhttps://theintercept.com/2020/10/01/naomi-klein-message-from-future-covid/eof/
       
 (DIR) Post #9zpKoerM0qeLs7MvWS by _1751015@mastodon.host
       2020-10-04T18:52:42Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @pluralistic Can I add some minor but very important details. I've write them here just several minutes ago: https://mastodon.host/@_1751015/104977934089980338Most of the biggest business in the USA is controlled by three "shareholders". The boards of the biggest companies share quite a lot of "directors". And for the end: pension funds and insurance companies are "stimulated" to buy shares in the same companies. IMO a very good and very ridged  scheme.