Post 9prFq2v2nmzK7KLSoy by Maxz@spinster.xyz
 (DIR) More posts by Maxz@spinster.xyz
 (DIR) Post #9prA2dlL2s3W8RQZXM by Rubicon2019@spinster.xyz
       2019-12-11T13:21:51Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       Download, and screenshot, and archive. 5. The whole guide is password-protected on Stonewall’s website. We wonder why they don’t want public scrutiny of this. However, Oxford Brookes helpfully have included the whole document on their website here https://t.co/MXsYgSicuB https://twitter.com/Challenged_Uni/status/1204680210039353344?s=20
       
 (DIR) Post #9prFq2v2nmzK7KLSoy by Maxz@spinster.xyz
       2019-12-11T14:26:46Z
       
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @Rubicon2019 According to Stonewall law... "There is a legal exemption in the Equality Act 2010, which means that public bodies which provide single-sex services can in some circumstances legally exclude trans people. In order to do this they need to prove that this is a ‘proportionate means to achieve a legitimate end’. They also need to prove that there is no other way they could have made sure that everyone could access the service. This is a high barrier of  proof, and there is very little case law which shows where an organisation could legitimately use this provision.You should allow anyone to access facilities, spaces and groups which align with their gender identity."OK so can someone explain this to me. If something is "single sex" then anyone who is not of that sex is excluded. So therefore it's nothing to do gender and nothing to do with trans people. How can stonewall order any organisation or business to allow trans people into single sex spaces when those spaces have nothing to do with gender?