Post 3086523 by farhan@bsd.network
 (DIR) More posts by farhan@bsd.network
 (DIR) Post #3084048 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T00:04:06Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       As of today I am moving away from Protonmail's paid plan and giving Mailfence's paid plan a shot.Protonmail's paid plan has not lived up to my expectations (notably the IMAP bridge breaks frequently), and the price is a bit too high.I will be using it for my personal domain.
       
 (DIR) Post #3084102 by bobstechsite@bobadon.rocks
       2019-01-18T00:05:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt tutanota's worth a look too BTW
       
 (DIR) Post #3084153 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T00:07:04Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @bobstechsite Tutanota won't let me use my own domain with IMAP/SMTP. I hate working with web email, and I much prefer to use something like Thunderbird.
       
 (DIR) Post #3084784 by farhan@bsd.network
       2019-01-18T00:30:51Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt Mailfence.. I'll look them up...
       
 (DIR) Post #3084809 by farhan@bsd.network
       2019-01-18T00:31:15Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt did you dislike them in any way?
       
 (DIR) Post #3084810 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T00:32:19Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @farhan In many ways, yes. I wrote this a few months ago describing my experiences:https://sprocket.writeas.com/protonmail-as-a-long-term-user
       
 (DIR) Post #3084952 by pxi@bsd.network
       2019-01-18T00:37:42Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt I'm moving away from protomail too... But to tutanota, they seem to be really boosting their desk app lately.
       
 (DIR) Post #3085029 by farhan@bsd.network
       2019-01-18T00:40:17Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt Great breakdown, I didn't realize they don't offer an IMAP service. That's a problem.
       
 (DIR) Post #3086493 by malin@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T01:57:41Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt @bobstechsite I use Tutanota and love what the team have been up to in general, but I have to say it's a drag that this one thing is locked into something that looks like Flashplayer on a rainy day and can never touch my own interfaces.Are any of the other email clients publicly verifiable in their encryption?
       
 (DIR) Post #3086506 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T01:58:30Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @malin @bobstechsite What do you mean publically verifiable? I know both Protonmail and Mailfence use standard PGP.
       
 (DIR) Post #3086515 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T01:59:12Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @farhan The IMAP is only for paid accounts, not free accounts.
       
 (DIR) Post #3086522 by malin@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T01:59:39Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt I mean someone being able to check the encryption from outside.I've never learnt pgp setups as I don't know anyone who would be up for setting that up on their own end, so it's kinda pointless. :(
       
 (DIR) Post #3086523 by farhan@bsd.network
       2019-01-18T01:59:31Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt Hm...that makes me not want to use it...
       
 (DIR) Post #3086632 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T02:06:11Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @malin Well, the Thunderbird plugin Enigmail is pretty solid, and I think there are other web browser extensions. Besides, PGP is kind of the de facto standard.
       
 (DIR) Post #3088113 by ajdunevent@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T03:23:28Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt €2.50/mo definitely doesn't seem bad. I look forward to hearing your opinion of the service once you've kicked the tires a bit.
       
 (DIR) Post #3091330 by Unairedspecifics@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T05:52:24Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt how many email "aliases" can you have on mailfence?
       
 (DIR) Post #3101129 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T13:42:35Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Unairedspecifics not sure
       
 (DIR) Post #3115721 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-18T21:14:05Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Unairedspecifics looks like a total of 10, and no option that I can see for a "catch-all"
       
 (DIR) Post #3125962 by Unairedspecifics@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-19T03:35:59Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @matt not familiar with this "cath-all" what does that entail?
       
 (DIR) Post #3138661 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-19T11:55:08Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Unairedspecifics Imagine you own a domain such as bob.com. Normally you need to set up specific accounts like bob@bob.com, wendy@bob.com, and so on.But what happens if someone emails an account that doesn't exist, like susie@bob.com? Normally it will bounce.That's where a catch-all comes in. You can designate a specific account to receive any emails that don't have accounts. IE if I emailed a non-existent account, I can designate "bob@bob.com" to receive them. That is a catch-all.
       
 (DIR) Post #3138704 by matt@linuxrocks.online
       2019-01-19T11:56:47Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Unairedspecifics The main benefit is that, if someone types in the wrong email address (ie: bobby@bob.com) it will go through.The downside is that it dramatically increases the amount of spam you can receive.