Post 2922653 by rtwx@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) More posts by rtwx@fosstodon.org
 (DIR) Post #2922246 by ohthehugemanatee@fosstodon.org
       2019-01-13T06:50:32Z
       
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       That feeling when you follow someone for their great top post, and their post frequency drowns your entire feed with their self-important bullshit.Don't take my unfollow the wrong way. You're clever and entertaining and I like you... For like 3 posts a day. But your stream of consciousness is a fire hose.
       
 (DIR) Post #2922431 by clacke@libranet.de
       2019-01-13T07:04:32Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       People dislike how the proprietary centralized things shouw you non-chronological feeds and such, but exactly this kind of thing would be useful to have algorithms for, like rate-limit this user by random sample or maybe even *gulp* by popularity of the posts.
       
 (DIR) Post #2922650 by JacobNeplokh@fosstodon.org
       2019-01-13T07:13:25Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @clacke @ohthehugemanatee Better be quite there or you’re gonna get crucified
       
 (DIR) Post #2922653 by rtwx@fosstodon.org
       2019-01-13T07:14:08Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @clacke @ohthehugemanatee yes.... but let ME set that, don’t just apply an algorithm not of my choosing.
       
 (DIR) Post #2922658 by clacke@libranet.de
       2019-01-13T07:20:00Z
       
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @rtwx @ohthehugemanatee The active choice of the user is a huge difference, absolutely.
       
 (DIR) Post #2922668 by ohthehugemanatee@fosstodon.org
       2019-01-13T07:19:15Z
       
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @clackeI would welcome a plug-in system for clients that allows an ecosystem of algorithms to grow. I'm ok with optional, user-selected filters.