Post 2827079 by kaniini@pleroma.site
(DIR) More posts by kaniini@pleroma.site
(DIR) Post #2826940 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T08:55:44.931122Z
3 likes, 0 repeats
if you're wondering, my activitypub improvement plan is essentially1. do common sense hardening in activitypub (expand the followers collection thus authorizing only the followers at a given moment)2. add some special sauce from second life (capability URIs, seeds)3. ???4. AP is fixed
(DIR) Post #2826992 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T08:59:00.389692Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
it'll be good, i promise
(DIR) Post #2827078 by Thib@social.sitedethib.com
2019-01-10T08:59:29Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@kaniini expanding the followers collection discloses it, though, which may or may not be wanted?
(DIR) Post #2827079 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:00:56.152085Z
1 likes, 0 repeats
@Thib well, ~technically~ AP requires that you disclose it so that ~proper~ (ha ha) implementations can compute the entire delivery list when delivering to a remote collection.
(DIR) Post #2827382 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:14:37.023960Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Thib i mean, sure, that works in theory.anyway, my plan was to have a setting for it.and maybe also a setting on the server side to generate separate messages to avoid disclosing the followers collection.
(DIR) Post #2827387 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:15:18.870553Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Thib (either way, Hubzilla and Friendica solve this by expanding the collections, I think its best to follow the established norm, don't you?)
(DIR) Post #2827518 by Thib@social.sitedethib.com
2019-01-10T09:19:13Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@kaniini also I'm not sure how much an improvement it is to post “private” message to *someone else's* followers to see over the current Mastodon situation (which isn't good).I guess I would like to post to the intersection of participant's followers, but that *does* require disclosing the follower collections.
(DIR) Post #2827519 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:20:46.684273Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Thib I want to be able to post to the OP's followers without exposure to Eugen's decision to play with JSON-LD sigs
(DIR) Post #2827558 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:22:32.606443Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@Thib I also want to restrict visibility of followers-only type posts based on when people are or are not followers.the visibility level is "private", yet you have to lock your accountthis is not good, nor is it a safe design
(DIR) Post #2827630 by LaH@mastodon.host
2019-01-10T09:12:14Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@kaniini 0. Newer ever let a reply go to more people then the original toot. IE, if it not public - send reply only to original instance.The instances can implement useful stuff like G+ like circles. Follower only is broken as concept.
(DIR) Post #2827631 by LaH@mastodon.host
2019-01-10T09:23:43Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@kaniini And rename delete to unpublish in the UI. Giving the users the bare idea they *can* delete stuff they posted on the internet is misleading as best, fraud at worst.
(DIR) Post #2827632 by kaniini@pleroma.site
2019-01-10T09:25:00.514055Z
0 likes, 0 repeats
@LaH just because Mastodon sucks at deleting doesn't mean Pleroma does.deletes in Pleroma are super effective and super deniable.but I agree with the sentiment, there's no way to be absolutely sure in fediverse
(DIR) Post #2827678 by LaH@mastodon.host
2019-01-10T09:27:17Z
0 likes, 1 repeats
@kaniini and users can take screen-shots, save to disc. standalone clients can have copies even if instances are perfect.