# taz.de -- Spotlight Populism: Should We Talk About Fascism?
       
       > The word populism has become a kind of container that serves almost
       > everything you do not like.
       
 (IMG) Bild: Margaret Thatcher and Ronald Reagan, priests of the 'more-market-and-less-state’ religon
       
       „Populism“ has been the word of the year 2016 in Spain according to Fundéu,
       the foundation that promotes the good use of Spanish in the media. If there
       was a time when this originally neutral word was used to define, today it
       is used to qualify and always with negative connotations. The fact that it
       has become the word of the year indicates its use – and also abuse – in a
       short period of time. Indeed, last year populism grew in stature in its
       most varied forms both in Europe and in the United States. However, we are
       not dealing with a political phenomenon coming out of the blue, born
       suddenly, nor it is a one-time phenomenon.
       
       Populism has had a long period of incubation in the last decades, since the
       concepts of right and left began to lose their original content with the
       supposed disappearance of ideology being replaced by a single religion, the
       Market, imposed by the conservative revolution of Margaret Thatcher and
       Ronald Reagan under the mantra of 'more-market-and-less-state’.
       
       The European left did not know how or did not want to avoid that neoliberal
       agenda. Social-Democracy began to walk along the „third way“ theorized by
       British sociologist Anthony Giddens. It took on the neoliberal postulates
       and in some cases, as in several policies imposed in the United Kingdom by
       the Labor government of Tony Blair, went further than the original
       conservative ones. The left allow herself to be dominated by financial
       elites and was dazzled by a supposed modernity.
       
       They were times of economic growth, of fat cows, of social progress. There
       was a visible socialization of benefits in the growth of public services
       and in the expansion of a middle class with numerous graduations according
       to the different schools of sociology. However, the cycle came to an abrupt
       end and a very painful one for most of the people. It was discovered how
       banks had swindled small savers, how corruption had become systemic in many
       countries, how in others it had kept its citizens obscure on issues that
       affected them. How they had to pay for the excesses of the others.
       
       To that first confusion, that of a left taking on ideas and policies of the
       right, another one has been added, opposite direction. Now it is the right
       that usurps approaches of the left in the social field. It claims to defend
       the disadvantaged, even at the cost of condemning other more disadvantaged
       people like refugees or immigrants, and proposes, at least on paper, to
       give greater weight to the state although there seems not to be much
       interest in the return of Keynes.
       
       Populism has its best breeding ground in confusion. If it is a question of
       fighting it, it must be done from clarity. In our postmodern world we are
       told that the ideological division between left and right no longer exists,
       that the axis is another one, but let us not fall into a delusion. This is
       not the same thing, a right-wing policy or a left-wing one, a conservative
       or a social-democratic one. The old axis continues to exist. We must
       confront it and turn around the old neoliberal mantra. We must demand
       'more-state-and-less-market’.
       
       Clarity also passes through an adequate use of language. Unfortunately, the
       word populism has become a kind of container that serves for almost
       everything you do not like. This wide and varied use makes its real meaning
       trivial while avoiding to call other things by their proper names. Why do
       we talk about populism when we should talk about fascism on so many
       occasions? Why do we use that word as synonymous with demagogy? It is the
       same perverse mechanism that invents a neologism and thus we speak of
       „post-truth“ when in all languages there is a word for it: „lie“.
       
       Rosa Massagué, Senior Analyst on Foreing Affairs at [1][El Periódico de
       Catalunya]. Former correspondent in London and Rome. Author of 'El legado
       político de Tony Blair’.
       
       8 Jun 2017
       
       ## LINKS
       
 (DIR) [1] http://www.elperiodico.com
       
       ## AUTOREN
       
 (DIR) Rosa Massagué
       
       ## TAGS
       
 (DIR) taz in English
 (DIR) taz international
 (DIR) Spotlight Populism in Europe
 (DIR) Populismus
 (DIR) Europa
 (DIR) Demokratie
 (DIR) taz in English
 (DIR) USA
       
       ## ARTIKEL ZUM THEMA
       
 (DIR) Alleged visa-faking ring in Ghana: The fake fake US embassy
       
       According to the US government a crime ring issued fake US visas out of an
       inconspicuous building in Ghana. The people living there are mystified.
       
 (DIR) A student exchange to provincial USA: Do you believe in evolution?
       
       At age 17 our author – a left-liberal, big-city Berlin girl – wants to go
       to New York, and lands up in rural America amongst nothing but Trump fans.
       What now?