# taz.de -- Anarchopanda on prohibition of being masked: „It's unconstitutional“
       
       > On Monday, Québec hold elections. No cause for celebration, says Julien
       > Villeneuve alias Anarchopanda. He struggles against the tightening of the
       > right to demonstrate.
       
 (IMG) Bild: Anarchopanda is hugged by two of his fans during a student demonstration in Montréal in 2012.
       
       taz: Monsieur Julien Villeneuve, in Germany, one tends to paint a pretty
       positive picture of Canada, often considering your country to be the better
       half of Northern America: welfare-state oriented, multicultural and
       peaceable. Is it a rose-tinted image? 
       
       Julien Villeneuve: Increasingly so, with our potentate Harper and his
       Conservatives at the helm.
       
       Why? 
       
       Austerity policies, anti-unionism, a most undemocratic view of
       parliamentary politics have been the hallmarks of this government, and I’m
       not sure the strong progression of the NDP in the last elections will be
       sufficient to stem that tide.
       
       Though, politically speaking, clocks are ticking at a different pace in
       your home state Québec, don't they? On Monday, the Québécois elect a new
       parliament, and the two leading parties are opponents of a federal
       government in the hands of the Conservatives. 
       
       On paper that is the case, although in practice both the Parti Québécois
       and the Liberals are collaborating or would collaborate with the federal
       government on key economic issues, for instance the development of
       pipelines, or the current secret negotiation of the Transatlantic Trade and
       Investment Partnership. The latter point is especially egregious insofar as
       the currently ruling Parti Québécois is concerned, given that it is
       ostensibly fighting for national sovereignty and we all know how free trade
       agreements bring along several important limitations to national
       sovereignty, usually in favor of big business.
       
       No matter who wins on Monday, it will be pretty hard to rejoice, although I
       believe the Parti Québécois deserves a spanking for dumping this noxious
       election on us in a foolish grab for a majority.
       
       In your role as wearer of the Anarchopanda costume you even put yourself up
       as candidate for the Parti Nul which regards itself as an option for people
       who would otherwise abstain from voting. 
       
       Yes, my main intention was mostly to initiate a public conversation on the
       topic of the value of voting, as well as the limitations of our current
       political system. I thought that would be more fruitful than simply
       secreting yet another harangue in support of abstentionism. Besides,
       although I do find enlightened abstentionism more philosophically
       defensible than most of what passes for good arguments for electoral
       politics these days, I don't think it's a straightforward matter that
       abstention is always the right answer. People did talk, so I suppose it was
       successful.
       
       But, shortly afterwards, you withdrew your candidature. Why? 
       
       It became apparent that some people might actually be voting for me, as
       opposed to simply using the Parti Nul as a mechanism to cancel their votes.
       The idea was simply to offer the option, not to tell people what to do.
       
       As Anarchopanda, you were first noticed in the public eye in March 2012
       when Québec experienced the biggest student strike in Canada's history,
       triggered by a drastic increase in tuition fees. Why did you choose to
       dress up in a costume to participate in demonstrations? 
       
       I was casually protesting, without a costume, from the beginning of the
       movement because I believed in the cause, but it’s the police violence and
       in particular the loss of an eye by a college student named Francis Grenier
       at the beginning of March 2012 which prompted me to take a more active
       role. I personally considered going on hunger strike to force the
       government to meet with the student representatives and negotiate, which
       they still refused to do after months of striking and several more students
       and supporters injured. But everybody told me it was dumb and asked me to
       think of something else. So I thought of Anarchopanda.
       
       Why did you chose a panda costume as outfit for demonstrations? 
       
       The panda costume looked nice and was cheap. It could have ended up being
       something else, although the correlation of the panda colours with the
       colors of anarchopacifism is a nice coincidence. But it is a coincidence.
       
       The student mass protest contributed to a political change in Québec in
       September 2012, and the current minority government of Prime Minister
       Pauline Marois withdrew the fee increase. Does this prove that civil
       disobedience can actually make a difference? 
       
       I’m glad the students got most of the fee removed, but that’s not what I
       call „making a difference“. The Parti Québécois used the student movement
       to get elected, as parties always do, and then repaid the students for
       their mostly unwilling collaboration. They're still indexing the fees
       yearly based on the cost of living or some such metric, and one day they'll
       change their mind and try for yet another hike. It goes without saying that
       I don’t find any of this particularly edifying. But yes, the students did
       scare the establishment a little, they did show other forms of organization
       were possible, and they did teach each other many things that are of use in
       current and future struggles. That’s making a difference.
       
       The current struggles in Québec and particularly in Montréal concern the
       limitations of the freedom of assembly that had been imposed as a reaction
       on the students protest. Due to local regulation P-6, demonstrators are
       obliged to submit in advance a venue or route of a demonstration in
       Montréal to the relevant police authorities for approval. And there's the
       prohibition of being masked during demonstrations – restrictions that are
       firmly anchored in German law and hardly challenged. 
       
       Parades submit routes in advance, not protests: for one, protests can be
       spontaneous, and more importantly, submitting a route and enforcing
       compliance with it is inherently hierarchical, and we don't want to force
       our social movements to organize in this way. At least I sure don't want
       that. For masks things are even worse, as the federal parliament passed a
       law last year including provisions for up to ten years in prison for
       wearing a mask during unlawful assemblies and riots, which is plainly
       ludicrous. There already were dispositions in the criminal code to further
       penalize criminals for wearing a mask while performing criminal acts.
       
       I do believe these dispositions are unconstitutional and just plain
       unwarranted limitations to freedom of assembly and freedom of expression
       and must be situated within a global context of the criminalization of
       dissent and the tightening of forms of social control. Our streets and
       squares have been where we gather to protest, such activities are a
       legitimate part of a democratic society, and the right to protect one’s
       identity while doing is all the more important in our world of increasing
       mass-surveillance.
       
       The latter is affecting your performance as Anarchopanda in particular. How
       often have you received a fine because the police have claimed you're
       wearing a mask during protest events since the legislation P-6 is in force? 
       
       Only once in April of 2013, the time they confiscated my head. I believe
       only one other person has received that ticket for wearing a scarf in a
       March 2013 protest against police brutality. It was cold, I would have worn
       a scarf were I not in costume.
       
       The police legitimated the confiscation of the panda head by saying that it
       has to serve as evidence against you. Did it feel like they had lost their
       marbles? 
       
       I was initially quite pissed off about the whole affair, because hey, it’s
       my head. Maybe the police got kinky with it, who knows. It would be a
       victimless crime. I had it washed just in case. But then the media ran with
       it and went berserk, and I thought it was both ludicrous and wonderful.
       People started talking about P-6 again, and we almost got parts of it
       repealed by the municipal council. For that kind of shitstorm, frankly,
       they could have kept the head as a tip. I’m kidding, it’s mine.
       
       This shitstorm has revealed a massive popularity that far exceeds the
       academic milieu in Montreal. How do you cope with your “celebrity status”? 
       
       People don’t know what I look like in human guise, which is the primary
       thing. I’m not recognized in the streets, people don’t come bother me with
       criticisms or praise, which is awesome, nobody buys me fancy drinks when I
       go out, which kind of sucks but is a small price to pay for having a
       private life. Of course one has to be careful with what one does with
       whatever ‘status’ has accrued to oneself, I just try to use it to help
       other people and I don’t think about it otherwise. I’m fine with people
       respecting me, but anything above that is pretty silly.
       
       Has anybody ever imitated you since you perform as Anarchopanda, disguising
       him/herself in a panda costume and attending a demonstration? 
       
       There have been a small number of other costume wearing protesters, most
       notably the Rabbit Crew, but we weren't doing the same thing. They were
       mostly following the grand tradition of protest clowns, dicking around with
       police and adding an element of fun and absurdity to protests, which in
       themselves can be quite boring. I did that too, I suppose, but the main
       idea was about what happened during police charges.
       
       When was the last time you put the plush costume on? 
       
       During the April 3rd demo against austerity, organized by [1][ASSÉ]
       (Association pour une Solidarité Syndicale Étudiante), the main driver
       behind the 2012 student strike. I only wear the costume for them or for
       things having to do with P-6 these days. Wearing the costume in and of
       itself is a pretty unpleasant experience, and I try to avoid it when I
       don't feel it's useful.
       
       And, when was the last time you hugged policemen during a demonstration? 
       
       Oh, it’s been a while, in 2012. I’ve only succeeded in hugging about ten
       policemen overall. In truth, hugging police officers is not that important
       to me, they should already know that during protests we’re not dangerous
       unless they repress us, one shouldn’t need to hug them to try to get that
       point across. But it’s something to do when not walking or intervening
       during police charges.
       
       On [2][Twitter], Anarchopanda soon will be followed by 9000 people, whereas
       Anarchopanda follows no one – except recently the Montreal Police. They, in
       turn, refuse to follow Anarchopanda! Isn't that an act of unfriendliness,
       given that the police are in such a privileged situation? 
       
       The real following is on [3][Facebook], over 19000 people. I only follow
       the police during protests, usually in order to refute whatever false or
       incomplete information they're broadcasting to influence the media. Rest
       assured that the police are in fact following me, and that I do not
       interpret this as a sign of friendliness.
       
       7 Apr 2014
       
       ## LINKS
       
 (DIR) [1] http://www.asse-solidarite.qc.ca/
 (DIR) [2] http://twitter.com/Anarchopanda
 (DIR) [3] http://de-de.facebook.com/Anarchopanda
       
       ## AUTOREN
       
 (DIR) Oliver Pohlisch
       
       ## TAGS
       
 (DIR) Quebec
 (DIR) Vermummungsverbot
 (DIR) Demonstrationsrecht
 (DIR) Studentenproteste
 (DIR) Reiseland Kanada
 (DIR) Quebec
 (DIR) Kanada
       
       ## ARTIKEL ZUM THEMA
       
 (DIR) Montréal, der frankophone Treffpunkt: Ein Boulevard der Vielfalt
       
       Küche, Kunst und Klamauk. Die neuen Rebellen beleben die Stadt mit ihrer
       Selbstverwirklichung. Auch die Älteren schätzen das zunehmend.
       
 (DIR) Anarchopanda über Vermummungsverbot: „Das ist verfassungswidrig“
       
       In Quebec wird am Montag gewählt. Kein Grund zum Jubeln, so Julien
       Villeneuve alias Anarchopanda. Er kämpft weiter gegen die Verschärfung des
       Demonstrationsrechts.
       
 (DIR) Kanadisches Protestmaskottchen: Polizei raubt Plüschbärschädel
       
       Er ist die Symbolfigur der Studentenproteste. Doch Anarchopanda verstößt
       gegen das Vermummungsverbot. Das kostete ihn kurzzeitig den Kopf.