Posts by cyberleagle@mastodon.social
 (DIR) Post #B4c7boqYxRjvhfxvCS by cyberleagle@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       In case you missed it (as I did) last month. Computer evidence debated again. https://www.computerweekly.com/news/366639272/Minister-wants-logical-conclusion-to-review-of-digital-evidence-in-light-of-Post-office-scandal
       
 (DIR) Post #B4c7bp3KBzwqLFw75k by cyberleagle@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Debate here. https://www.theyworkforyou.com/lords/?id=2026-02-11a.258.1#g258.2
       
 (DIR) Post #B4c7bpEJX8jqtL4tDk by cyberleagle@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Lord Beamish: "I would love to know what the Ministry of Justice has been doing for the last year because it is a very simple thing; nor is it controversial."  Unpopular opinion: it is not at all simple and I have some sympathy with the MoJ in trying to work out what to do.
       
 (DIR) Post #B4c7br1ypy3qTfK4H2 by cyberleagle@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       For example, if S.69 were reinstated this would apply not just to the prosecution but to a defendant who wanted to rely on e.g. dashcam footage or a mobile phone video. How would a defendant go about doing that?