Posts by airtower@woem.men
 (DIR) Post #B45xxG4xgh5LdzZDoO by airtower@woem.men
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       "Would be nice to have our own forge. And equip some sword lesbians." – @kristacatAgreed! ​:meowgiggle:​
       
 (DIR) Post #B5fBXozDWeiI4Ml3Gi by airtower@woem.men
       2 likes, 0 repeats
       
       So there's a "Working Group for GCC AI Policy" now: https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/working-group-ai-policyGiven that LLVM is accepting LLM-generated code I really hope #GCC won't, but I have no influence there. If you do, please use it!
       
 (DIR) Post #B6jXUX7czLXuaCdQ4O by airtower@woem.men
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @MissInformation@chaos.social @littlefox@gotosocial-dev.svc.0x0a.network Will da gar nicht widersprechen, neu ist es allerdings nicht. Was jetzt diskutiert wird ist nur den zusätzlichen Betrag zu erhöhen.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7P30uISSO360fmQ2C by airtower@woem.men
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Things I did not expect when going freelance: Having to explain to my tax advisor that the mail security system they were sold looks like basically fraud. "We do transport encryption" wasn't sufficient 20 years ago, let alone now. No, not even if you use the "latest BSI-approved algorithms"… ​:neocat_googly_shocked:​