Post BA5L92y0DhK9rJ1r5k by tmw@ioc.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by tmw@ioc.exchange
 (DIR) Post #BA1lM9n8Y5iUZEiKw4 by keepassxc@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @spitfire @nieuemma @Em0nM4stodon :blobcatno:
       
 (DIR) Post #BA1mO6KAVjTiLaeglM by kerravonsen@mastodon.au
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Em0nM4stodon @keepassxc I stopped using KeePassXC when I switched to Gentoo Linux recently; they don't support it. So I fell back to using the original keepass, even though the interface is clunky.
       
 (DIR) Post #BA1mO6gVAhLJSr6WZc by keepassxc@fosstodon.org
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kerravonsen @Em0nM4stodon Probably due to the Qt5 dependency. You can try out 2.8 snapshots.
       
 (DIR) Post #BA1oPhKmatrvKTpdKK by kerravonsen@mastodon.au
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @keepassxc @Em0nM4stodon That sounds vaguely familiar.But I would MUCH rather stick with what is supported by my distro than spend my precious time trying to get non-supported stuff to work, unless I have no alternative. But keepass is a workable alternative. If KeePassXC does become supported again, well, I'll think about it then.
       
 (DIR) Post #BA5L92y0DhK9rJ1r5k by tmw@ioc.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @keepassxc @spitfire @nieuemma @Em0nM4stodon um... the "no" is kind of ambiguous and uhh... hard to tell nowadays