Post B9xfHqZmBvHIZ5Gu2q by baldur@toot.cafe
 (DIR) More posts by baldur@toot.cafe
 (DIR) Post #B9xfHnMC9xdEa5tVxY by baldur@toot.cafe
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       I admittedly i don’t have that many coding client projects left these days but in the ones I’ve got left, most of the coders I work with have adopted LLMsFor what it’s worth, they do seem to understand much less, work much slower towards the project’s actual goals, with much more code, and at a lower qualityWhile asking sillier questionsBut they think they’re working so much faster because the tools find the occasional bug and generates so much code🤷🏻‍♂️
       
 (DIR) Post #B9xfHnZJNC7jEm1zP6 by kaneel@mas.to
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @baldur to think we used to say "less code less bugs" and this is where we are now…
       
 (DIR) Post #B9xfHp9rSmxEAQ8h0q by baldur@toot.cafe
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       The reason why I keep writing about how coder perception of these tools—how effective they think they are—is that I keep encountering coders whose perception of these tools is detached from their own reality.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9xfHqZmBvHIZ5Gu2q by baldur@toot.cafe
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       Like, I remember how good you were ten years ago, how sharp your questions were, how structured and incisive your code was, and how focused you were on accomplishing the project’s goals. I don’t have amnesia. It’s obvious that things have changed.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9xyL8YNhq5YJptx8C by landelare@mastodon.gamedev.place
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @kaneel @baldur I thought that was scientifically proven. I can't find the study, but the result spanned across programming languages.