Post B9o4mBrgdDbNw9E63E by IzzyOnDroid@floss.social
 (DIR) More posts by IzzyOnDroid@floss.social
 (DIR) Post #B9nm0qx8lYMaII3VJY by IzzyOnDroid@floss.social
       1 likes, 2 repeats
       
       Yes, @IzzyOnDroidOrg has a strict LLM policy¹. You might have noticed that, a while ago, @Codeberg also introduced one². Now SourceHut follows this path, too: https://sourcehut.org/blog/2026-08-27-tos-changes-and-llms/We all have good reasons to do so. Read it in our policies. Ideally, before you apply 😉¹ https://izzyondroid.org/docs/general/AppInclusionPolicy/#ai-policy² https://blog.codeberg.org/protecting-our-floss-commons-from-llms.html#LLM #IzzyOnDroid #Codeberg #SourceHut
       
 (DIR) Post #B9nmNwEfI7elL2GCno by daniel@masto.doserver.top
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @IzzyOnDroid Does @fdroidorg have such a policy, or at least a 'slop' anti-feature tag?
       
 (DIR) Post #B9no4HkDoNfKADmFc0 by IzzyOnDroid@floss.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @daniel to my knowledge, not. No such policy, but a related "anti-feature" is discussed for quite a while now, but no "verdict" in sight.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9noDIUGQ6354bbtqa by daniel@masto.doserver.top
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @IzzyOnDroid Hu, thanks.You would think the anti-feature would be a no brainer... other than it maybe being hard to monitor the honesty of such a labelGood to know that apps on your repos should be slop free though :)
       
 (DIR) Post #B9o4mBrgdDbNw9E63E by IzzyOnDroid@floss.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @nube one big difference here is that @Codeberg is not VC funded – they live from membership fees and donations from "real people" who want see them succeed. That's one reason I became a Codeberg member. And I'm with Codeberg before the world knew it would be – back in the days when the "pilot project" was still called "TeaHub". "Some people™" gave it max a year then, claiming it would never take off 🤷‍♂️ And here we are, almost 8 years later…