Post B9XVusWpJbhKJTuqzw by arroyocc@masto.nyc
 (DIR) More posts by arroyocc@masto.nyc
 (DIR) Post #B9XOPFd1CCCD0hmf7w by khm@hj.9fs.net
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       summarizing pro-slop arguments from a Certain ThreadI am addicted to slopBanning slop would cause me more workI am a slop centrist (i.e., addicted, but unwilling to admit it)I am a pedant, and do not believe you can satisfy my desire for pedantry (x3)I have carefully structured a bad analogy so that I can imply you are stupidAttempts to regulate slop constitute discrimination against me, the sloptimistYou are (i.e. I am) not smart enough to identify slop (x3)Slop exists, and therefore you should spend your resources supporting itWhataboutismThe ends justify the meansEnthusiastic amorality: I don't like slop, but am eager to accomodate sloptimistsDifferent whataboutism
       
 (DIR) Post #B9XQT0kKfVZ9vB7qjo by lanodan@queer.hacktivis.me
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @khm Also Achievement Get: Someone who participated in the thread then sent an "unsubscribe" email to the whole mailing-list.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9XVusWpJbhKJTuqzw by arroyocc@masto.nyc
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @khm I really appreciated your post on that thread. Opposing a policy because it cannot be enforced mechanically is silly. Just because a rule can be enforced easily does not make it impartial.We put locks on our doors even though they can be trivially picked, because they let would-be intruders know our intention to protect our homes.
       
 (DIR) Post #B9XVuslMRZK92YiSeW by khm@hj.9fs.net
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       frustrating that we still have to explain to people that "might makes right" is a shitty way to run a civilization