Post B8byH2zyMiEEVFipfM by joshbressers@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) More posts by joshbressers@infosec.exchange
 (DIR) Post #B8btviOjMamMiHsJM0 by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       should pc(5) files gain the ability to specify CPE identifiers?
       
 (DIR) Post #B8buQHQhgFKi3AN91M by joshbressers@infosec.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne CPE sucks rocks. I would allow other identifiers like PURL also
       
 (DIR) Post #B8bv1mZypVEBNDasls by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @joshbressers what PURLs do you anticipate being stored in a pc(5) file?
       
 (DIR) Post #B8bxYjWvO5m1Ng0LVg by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @joshbressers (the point here being that, you can write a PURL for a pc(5) file now, which can be used to map to other identifiers)
       
 (DIR) Post #B8byH2zyMiEEVFipfM by joshbressers@infosec.exchange
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @ariadne Ahhh, I didn't know it could already do PURLs, very nice!Adding CPE certainly wouldn't hurt. and there are things CPE can identify PURL can'tI still hate them though :)
       
 (DIR) Post #B8c155Qzmb4cRfLloW by ariadne@social.treehouse.systems
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @joshbressers me too