Post B87nsg1MvkmAwI6ckK by klausman@mas.to
 (DIR) More posts by klausman@mas.to
 (DIR) Post #B87nsg1MvkmAwI6ckK by klausman@mas.to
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @nieldk @Two9A @Wolkensteine @lumi That's my main worry here: enforceability is muddy and false positives are going to sour developer relationships right quick.
       
 (DIR) Post #B87oLAk6InsqKQcHeS by klausman@mas.to
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lumi @nieldk @Two9A @Wolkensteine I am no gen-AI apologist, not by a long shot, but I do hope that CB does as you say and won't nuke/ban/.... things just because someone somewhere feels something looks gen-AI-ish.
       
 (DIR) Post #B888CXlvJBCkEJdFKq by zleap@techhub.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @Wolkensteine @lumi @Codeberg Surely, it should be allowed on the condition that it is made clear if AI has been used as part of the development / prototyping process.  But a good project will be transparent about all that anyway.
       
 (DIR) Post #B89bupit1HoeTTdtoG by creepy_owlet@mastodon.online
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @lumi @Codeberg @Wolkensteine @zleap yeah, ban everything that someone has strong opinion about. It definitely isn't going to backfire 😐