Post B86dawQG1CNhtYgwnA by mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
 (DIR) More posts by mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
 (DIR) Post #B86RUyfRYmENfcBVvE by piggo@piggo.space
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante how do you prove something is slop of it doesn't have it written all over the code with em dashes and coauthored by commit signatures
       
 (DIR) Post #B86RcaDmKmYWAUs5Ka by nach@detroitriotcity.com
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante just uploaded my vibe coded notepadd app to codeberg, thanks for the heads up! :ui_dance:
       
 (DIR) Post #B86daKXiqzm2PhtN9U by Humpleupagus@eveningzoo.club
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       > It's vibe coded because we don't like the developer
       
 (DIR) Post #B86dawQG1CNhtYgwnA by mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante how would you even detect that? Aside from people that say they vibecoded stuff, I dont think thats very detectable unless you employ people or (heh) LLMs to check for it.
       
 (DIR) Post #B86jccMQB7Khyj51Ky by thejessiekirk@ohai.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante Thanks for giving me AI tech bros to block. 👍
       
 (DIR) Post #B86k6WdY1WeAujLsQq by foxyoreos@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @crankylinuxuser @tante this gets brought up a lot, but my perspective is:A) a lot of AI projects are proud of it and will disclose it somewhere. B) the collaborative nature of Open Source makes it difficult for larger projects to hide process details indefinitely. C) if the outcome of this is that projects using AI hide their usage and don't evangelize it, that is a significant win that we should take. AI "detection" is unnecessary for a rule like this.
       
 (DIR) Post #B86k6XDhr5ZQisGknA by foxyoreos@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @crankylinuxuser @tante programmers are some of the biggest AI evangelists right now, and if a bunch of them start hiding their usage, that is a serious blow to companies like Microsoft and Anthropic who are counting on them to help drive a narrative about demand. We take those wins; those are real wins. I want people using AI to hide their usage rather than to be public about it, I want it to be something that's culturally shameful to admit.
       
 (DIR) Post #B86kBKpvKBc3lPQy5w by lumi@snug.moe
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @foxyoreos @crankylinuxuser @tante yes, exactly. it should be shameful to admitthis doesn't mean we should be shaming them, though. the shame should be coming from themselves
       
 (DIR) Post #B86kMLzRNO3IWi8iFk by CyReVolt@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @tante ah yea, SlopHub, not Slopberg, thank you!
       
 (DIR) Post #B86m1T8LowmwVeTbDE by foxyoreos@mastodon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @crankylinuxuser @tante Right, and what I'm saying is that when a project author shows up demanding ontological proof that AI is evil and for you to rigorously define the exact syntactic line between modern LLMs and other forms of AI - that's your detection. You don't need to run an AI detection service on the code.You wait for the project author to completely voluntarily, unprompted (pun intended) volunteer that they use specifically LLMs, and then you ban those projects.
       
 (DIR) Post #B86m1TKl4oiH88HVYG by foxyoreos@mastodon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @crankylinuxuser @tante > And how does one propose to tell if it's LLM-assisted code?You post that it's good to hide LLM usage and that people should be embarrassed about using them, and then your LLM-using projects will tell you that they're using LLMs during the resulting argument. It's a surprisingly reliable detection method.
       
 (DIR) Post #B8AL5PYFA4m8QY5AwK by mischievoustomato@tsundere.love
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @crankylinuxuser @tante fuck Mary Shelley for this. What a piece of shit bitch