Post B7xaqParnKdIQUhSwy by djb@cr.yp.to
 (DIR) More posts by djb@cr.yp.to
 (DIR) Post #B7xaoWa6qLVXWGRi1g by djb@cr.yp.to
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       NSA lost IETF's February 2026 vote on this NSA-driven document. See https://blog.cr.yp.to/20260405-votes.html for tallies. Do they admit what happened? No. They call another vote and try hard to pack the room with new pro-NSA voters. But if we show up and object, all they can do is whimper.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7xaoWtbfr6UUjZHPs by letoams@defcon.social
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @djb note this exact strategy was attempted by the vendors who didn’t want TLS 1.3 to happen because ephemeral key exchanges were made mandatory in TLS 1.3 ruining their network monitoring capabilities. They sent lots of people to try and block TLS 1.3, but the attempts didn’t work.The IETF has experience with people sending sockpuppets. It is sad to see you attempt a similar strategy.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7xaqParnKdIQUhSwy by djb@cr.yp.to
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @letoams "There is no formal membership in the IETF.  Participation is open to all. This participation may be by on-line contribution, attendance at face-to-face sessions, or both. Anyone from the Internet community who has the time and interest is urged to participate in IETF meetings and any of its on-line working group discussions."You're trying to disenfranchise real people by calling them "sockpuppets". You hype a few pseudonymous objections, ignoring pseudonymous _support_ statements.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7xaqPqoq1ORDyACoa by letoams@defcon.social
       1 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @djb sure like last round where people copy pasted your template and then later apologized and confirmed they didn’t know what they were talking about and had been mislead by your social media postings to act. *slow clap*