Post B7fomzqqBS0pyHtZiq by rk@well.com
 (DIR) More posts by rk@well.com
 (DIR) Post #B7fomzNPwqTcV284rQ by rk@well.com
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pulkomandy I am surprisingly familiar with that standard (I’ve implemented pieces of it).The standard is…not great. A lot of functions defined as “Look at FuncFoo for more information” in various places but “FuncFoo” is *never defined anywhere*. Lots of typos and missing struct definitions. But yes. I do have a soft spot in my heart for that spec.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7fomzqqBS0pyHtZiq by rk@well.com
       0 likes, 1 repeats
       
       @pulkomandy This is on my desk as we speak. The first edition, documenting Windows 3, 16-bit.
       
 (DIR) Post #B7fon2VgIZryDX1Deq by rk@well.com
       0 likes, 0 repeats
       
       @pulkomandy And yes that plus the ECMA-standardized version of FAT-16 would also be a Completely Standards-Compliant Operating System.